| Author |
Message |
Trekkin and Birdin
WGA Member

Joined: 2007-02-08
Posts: 4696
Location: West Salem WI
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:31 am |
|
There's a Minnesota puzzle I've been staring at. So far, I've been told it "involves computer code, but if I told you anymore, I'd give it away."
Who knows? The person who told me that is a software engineer, LOL. I recognize things like a series of 0s and 1s and understand how to work through those. This one is absolutely stumping me.
8*2*8*3+6*9*8*3
I don't want a straight answer, but if someone can at least tell me what I'm looking at, I can try to find out what I need to know to solve it. Thanks! |
_________________ Trekkin' and Birdin'
Let's just go out and find caches and be done with it! |
|
|
 |
sandlanders
WGA Member

Joined: 2008-01-18
Posts: 17266
Location: Adams, WI
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:41 am |
|
Don't know code, but in straight math, that's multiply first four numbers, multiply second four numbers, add the two products together.  |
| |
|
|
 |
Trekkin and Birdin
WGA Member

Joined: 2007-02-08
Posts: 4696
Location: West Salem WI
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:47 am |
|
Nope, not it. Tried that. Doesn't work, which is why I contacted a previous finder I know. |
_________________ Trekkin' and Birdin'
Let's just go out and find caches and be done with it! |
|
|
 |
Trekkin and Birdin
WGA Member

Joined: 2007-02-08
Posts: 4696
Location: West Salem WI
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:00 pm |
|
I'm thinking it might be written in some version of FORTRAN. I sort of kind of remember stuff like this from some required class that I barely managed to squeak past! |
_________________ Trekkin' and Birdin'
Let's just go out and find caches and be done with it! |
|
|
 |
CodeJunkie
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-07-21
Posts: 7593
Location: Berlin, WI
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:35 pm |
|
CodeJunkie Says - "As a programmer - this is poor programming because you're relying on the operator precedence of the language in question." "As a fellow cacher - need more info"
Can you post a link to the cache? That may provide some clues to solving this one. I would agree that by most programming standards it's multiply on both sides and then add the results (i.e. 1680). |
| |
|
|
 |
sandlanders
WGA Member

Joined: 2008-01-18
Posts: 17266
Location: Adams, WI
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 2:44 pm |
|
That's how it looked when I was writing FORTRAN back in 1971. Do they want you to use keypunch cards to solve the puzzle for the cache, too?  |
| |
|
|
 |
Trekkin and Birdin
WGA Member

Joined: 2007-02-08
Posts: 4696
Location: West Salem WI
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:17 pm |
|
That's a King Boreas century challenge cache in the greater Twin Cities, and what I shared is it. Seriously! For those not familiar with KB cache listings, he generally provides only a little info. No hints, just the bare minimum.
And in this case, a comment to "ask whoever gave you the solves for your 100 mystery finds!"
This is the listing....GC18B71 |
_________________ Trekkin' and Birdin'
Let's just go out and find caches and be done with it! |
|
|
 |
TheBalks
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-01-05
Posts: 388
Location: Cashton, WI
|
Posted:
Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:08 am |
|
|
|
 |
CodeJunkie
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-07-21
Posts: 7593
Location: Berlin, WI
|
Posted:
Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:05 am |
|
| Trekkin' and Birdin' wrote: |
That's a King Boreas century challenge cache in the greater Twin Cities, and what I shared is it. Seriously! For those not familiar with KB cache listings, he generally provides only a little info. No hints, just the bare minimum.
And in this case, a comment to "ask whoever gave you the solves for your 100 mystery finds!"
This is the listing....GC18B71 |
I looked at this and gave it a whirl but only got "Incorrect" via the checker. My first thought was the left hand side was an offset to add to the North and the right hand side was an offset to add to the West. That didn't work for me. |
| |
|
|
 |
2CraziesMSN
WGA Member

Joined: 2006-06-14
Posts: 269
Location: Madison, Wi
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
still working on it, It will come |
| |
|
|
 |
marc_54140
WGA Member

Joined: 2004-01-28
Posts: 2625
Location: Little Chute
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:28 pm |
|
Possibly is is NOT base 10. |
| |
|
|
 |
Trekkin and Birdin
WGA Member

Joined: 2007-02-08
Posts: 4696
Location: West Salem WI
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:56 pm |
|
With a 9, wouldn't you think it's base 10, though? I say this as if I actually understand this stuff! |
_________________ Trekkin' and Birdin'
Let's just go out and find caches and be done with it! |
|
|
 |
sandlanders
WGA Member

Joined: 2008-01-18
Posts: 17266
Location: Adams, WI
|
Posted:
Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:19 pm |
|
Could be base 11, 12, etc.
I couldn't make any sense of all the logs on this one or the other cache referenced in them. Good thing our puzzle count is only in the 70s so far...
...And that we're not that close to this cache for it to tempt us. |
| |
|
|
 |
marc_54140
WGA Member

Joined: 2004-01-28
Posts: 2625
Location: Little Chute
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:48 am |
|
| sandlanders wrote: |
Good thing our puzzle count is only in the 70s so far... |
70!!!
You need to come to the Kingdom! If for no other reason, then to do my 900 series. |
| |
|
|
 |
marc_54140
WGA Member

Joined: 2004-01-28
Posts: 2625
Location: Little Chute
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:50 am |
|
BTW, after googling, I go this....
(8 * 2 * 8 * 3) + (6 * 9 * 8 * 3) = 1 680
Does the space between the 1 and 6 help? |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|