| Author |
Message |
glorkar
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-09-24
Posts: 496
Location: Oshkosh/Berlin
|
Posted:
Mon May 17, 2010 5:25 pm |
|
I've not found one yet, but they seem to be pretty prevalent in my area. Any tips on what they look like? When it says a 3 foot rod 1/2 foot below surface, do they mean that the entire rod is buried 6 inches down, or that's how far in the ground it's planted? |
| |
|
|
 |
AstroD-Team
WGA Member

Joined: 2004-05-19
Posts: 730
|
Posted:
Tue May 18, 2010 11:13 am |
|
Here is a picture of a typical rod.... they are usually contained inside a cylinder with an access cover to protect them. On the outer edge of the access cover is the PID or ID to ensure you found the correct one.
Image of rod inside an access cover
Access cover closed protecting metal rod
Another type of rod that is more difficult to verify as there are no markings and can be confused for property markers (Hence proof of measurments matching up with the origina description is crucial) that we have come across are actual metal rods....
This particular one was 9 inches below ground.
You will need to read the description. It should mention what you are looking for - a metal rod or the access covered metal rods. From experience, the first example are the most numerous now a days. As we like to call them, the "micros" of benchmarking as they are plentiful, usually easy to find and right off the road.
Good Luck! |
_________________ It is those whose case is weak who make the most clamour. Pier Anthony |
|
|
 |
RSplash40
WGA Member

Joined: 2006-12-23
Posts: 5954
|
Posted:
Tue May 18, 2010 11:40 am |
|
Wow that last one was a true treasure hunt :> |
_________________ Accosting pine tree's and rendering caches harmless since 2005.... |
|
|
 |
glorkar
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-09-24
Posts: 496
Location: Oshkosh/Berlin
|
Posted:
Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm |
|
I actually think most of the ones around here are the second type. For instance: PN0697
To me it sounds like the second one. Am I wrong? |
| |
|
|
 |
AstroD-Team
WGA Member

Joined: 2004-05-19
Posts: 730
|
Posted:
Tue May 18, 2010 4:26 pm |
|
| glorkar wrote: |
I actually think most of the ones around here are the second type. For instance: PN0697
To me it sounds like the second one. Am I wrong? |
Yeah, it definitely sounds like the second. In this case the GC.com page has the info you need, but its always best to use the original datasheet. Sometimes they provide a lot more info. It would be interesting to see if the markings are still on the curb.
Remember, any BMs on private property - you must secure permission first! I find that's half the fun!
Let me know how it goes. Good Luck!! |
_________________ It is those whose case is weak who make the most clamour. Pier Anthony |
|
|
 |
glorkar
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-09-24
Posts: 496
Location: Oshkosh/Berlin
|
Posted:
Tue May 18, 2010 6:30 pm |
|
|
|
 |
glorkar
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-09-24
Posts: 496
Location: Oshkosh/Berlin
|
Posted:
Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:48 pm |
|
Found my first rod type mark today! It was a pretty easy one, set in a concrete culvert. Still pretty cool. You can check out the pics on the log at: OM0554 |
| |
|
|
 |
Johnny Cache
WGA Member

Joined: 2005-08-30
Posts: 304
Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:41 am |
|
Found my first rivet in Woodruff last weekend. QM0431 |
| |
|
|
 |
glorkar
WGA Member

Joined: 2009-09-24
Posts: 496
Location: Oshkosh/Berlin
|
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:53 am |
|
Nice recovery. Gotta say though, I like disks and intersection stations much better. They are more interesting than just a nub of metal in concrete. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|