The Wisconsin Geocaching Association

  Login or Register

Website Navigation

62.png Home

49.png Information Center
26.png WGA Newsletters
24.png Reviewer's Words
53.png Presentation Resources
39.png Geocaching Files
27.png Bookmarks
56.png Location Rules and Regs

17.png Forums
16.png New Posts
20.png Unanswered Posts

calendar_day.png Upcoming Events
mapicon.png Map
29.png Calendar
11.png Submit Event

shield_star.png Cache of the Month
mapicon.png Past Winners Map

LonelyCache.png Lonely Cache Game
mapicon.png Current Map
26.png Scoreboard
11.png Submit Report

rescueiconsm.png Cache Rescue
11.png Submit a Mission

icon_community.gif Members
27.png Your Account

icon_members.gif NewsShow/Hide content
tree-T.gif Topics
tree-T.gif Archives

image_cultured.png Photo GalleryShow/Hide content
tree-T.gif Updates
tree-L.gif Popular

shield.png Fun Stuff
28.png Recent Logs
TB.gif Picnic to Picnic TB Race Standings
TB.gif WGA Hauler

49.png Board of Directors
 
Contact Us

 
Facebook

Wisconsin Geocaching Association

 
Follow Us

Twitter Button

 
Subscribe to Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
 
Geocaching.com Search
View Search Syntax
 
COTM
Winner -
April 2013 Northern Zone:
North Country Trail: Swedish Settlement

Winner -
April 2013 Northeast Zone:
Where Are the Cows?

Winner -
April 2013 West Central Zone:
Marathon Mystery

Winner -
April 2013 South Central Zone:
Sepulchre

Winner -
April 2013 Southeast Zone:
Mind Maze

Winner -
April 2013 Series of the Month:
Dr Seuss Series


More Info >>>

 
 
Wisconsin Geocaching Association: Forums
 

 

View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Team_Sandman
WGA Member



Joined: 2010-04-01
Posts: 292
Location: Green Bay

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 7:51 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I've been using a Magellan Triton 300 since I started caching and I've sent it back twice and now there sending me a Triton 400 big deal I could really careless. But anyway that was my mistake.. I have it narrowed down to a few.
1. Delorme PN-40
2. Garmin Dakota 20
3. Garmin Oregon 200

Need alittle help here...
 
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
zuma
WGA Member



Joined: 2006-01-30
Posts: 5530
Location: Eau Claire

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 2:57 am Reply with quote Back to top

sandman4182 wrote:
I've been using a Magellan Triton 300 since I started caching and I've sent it back twice and now there sending me a Triton 400 big deal I could really careless. But anyway that was my mistake.. I have it narrowed down to a few.
1. Delorme PN-40
2. Garmin Dakota 20
3. Garmin Oregon 200

Need alittle help here...


The Oregon would be an excellent choice, already discussed a few times in these forums. I would not get the 200 though. You want the 400T, which is best for caching.

z

_________________
Keep On Cachin In The Free World.

All posts are the opinions of the poster and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the WGA Board of Directors. 
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SammyClaws
WGA Member



Joined: 2007-04-27
Posts: 331
Location: Muskego

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 8:06 am Reply with quote Back to top

You list contains all good units. I am partial to the Oregon since I own one. Which model would depend on your style of caching. In SE Wisconsin, I have not had need for a topo map, but I have downloaded free road maps of the US which work great. In addition, you can create custom maps from google earth and they have or are introducing Birdseye, which is satellite image maps. I would suggest looking at the Oregons without maps.

One side note, if you do a lot of Earthcaches, the 550 has a camera built in.
 
View user's profile Send private message
Team_Sandman
WGA Member



Joined: 2010-04-01
Posts: 292
Location: Green Bay

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 3:23 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I was on GSAK and was looking at uploading to the oregon and I didnt see the 400t I seen everything eles and was wondering if it compatible
 
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
The Yinnies
WGA Member



Joined: 2007-06-03
Posts: 100

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 3:59 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I have owned all of the above execpt the 200, I had the 300 and the 450. If you go with a Garmin there are free maps so you do not need the T. Out of the garmins I liked the Dakota 20 the best. There is a problem seeing it in the sun and when driving. I went back and am staying with the Delorme PN-40 and already have a PN-60 on pre-order. If you would like I could help you out with maps if you decide to go with the garmins. Again do not buy a T, the free maps are actually better than the Topo's garmin has. I also will be selling a like new PN-40 when I get my PN-60.
Thanks
 
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:       
Post new topic   Reply to topic

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2008 phpBB Group
:: Theme & Graphics by Daz :: Ported for PHP-Nuke by nukemods.com ::
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
 
Forums ©
 
Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Parental Consent Form | contact | Comments ]

All content © 2013 Wisconsin Geocaching Association, except comments and forum entries which are property of their posters.

The Groundspeak Geocaching Logo is a registered trademark of Groundspeak, Inc. Used with permission.
 


Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the WGA Terms of Use


Distributed by Raven PHP Scripts
New code written and maintained by the RavenNuke™ TEAM


(Original PHP-Nuke Code Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi)
Page Generation: 0.12 Seconds

:: fisubice phpbb2 style by Daz :: PHP-Nuke theme by www.nukemods.com ::
:: fisubice Theme Recoded To 100% W3C CSS & HTML 4.01 Transitional & XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance by RavenNuke™ TEAM ::

:: W3C CSS Compliance Validation :: W3C HTML 4.01 Transitional Compliance Validation :: W3C XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance Validation ::