The Wisconsin Geocaching Association

  Login or Register

Website Navigation

62.png Home

49.png Information Center
26.png WGA Newsletters
24.png Reviewer's Words
53.png Presentation Resources
39.png Geocaching Files
27.png Bookmarks
56.png Location Rules and Regs
49.png BOD Info Center

17.png Forums
16.png New Posts
20.png Unanswered Posts

calendar_day.png Upcoming Events
mapicon.png Map
29.png Calendar
11.png Submit Event

mapicon.png WGA State Park CachesNew content !

shield_star.png Cache of the Month
mapicon.png Past Winners Map

LonelyCache.png Lonely Cache Game
mapicon.png Current Map
26.png Scoreboard
11.png Submit Report

rescueiconsm.png Cache Rescue
11.png Submit a Mission

icon_community.gif Members
27.png Your Account
47.png Private Messages
contact_blue.png WGA Member Map
Geocaching_LIVE_poweredby_16.png GC.COM Authorization

icon_members.gif News
tree-T.gif Topics
tree-T.gif Archives
tree-L.gif Submit News

image_cultured.png Photo Gallery
tree-T.gif Updates
tree-L.gif Popular

shield.png Fun Stuff
28.png Recent Logs
TB.gif Picnic to Picnic TB Race Standings
TB.gif WGA Hauler

49.png Board of Directors
Contact Us


Wisconsin Geocaching Association

Follow Us

Twitter Button

Subscribe to Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required Search
View Search Syntax
Winner -
September 2014 Northern Zone:
Bunyan's Bowling Ball

Winner -
September 2014 Northeast Zone:
Gardner Swamp Thing

Winner -
September 2014 West Central Zone:
Upper Dells SNA

Winner -
September 2014 South Central Zone:
Old Meets New

Winner -
September 2014 Southeast Zone:

Winner -
September 2014 Series of the Month:
Meet the WGA series

More Info >>>

Wisconsin Geocaching Association: Forums


View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Folk Trakers
WGA Member

Joined: 2003-04-30
Posts: 346
Location: Racine, WI, USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:04 am Reply with quote Back to top

First, let me start by saying what a nice, civil discussion this thread has. There is a lot of differing opinions, but everyone has stated them clearly, concisely, and in no attacking manner. KUDOS!

I think our approvers do alot and approving caches is not as simple as many newer cachers think. One discussion we've had in our household is regarding the amount of caches a 'new' cacher puts out. We've seen instances where someone gets the caching bug, completes 10 caches, then puts out 3,4, or 5 of their own. They have little experience as to the styles and really have no idea what it takes to maintain a cache. Many people feel they can maintain many caches when they are still so new at the sport/hobby that they really still don't know all that is involved. We've often wondered if there could be some type of 'orientation period' where new cachers can only have so many approved within their first 50 or 100 finds. Then, after they reach those milestones, they've personally learned alot and their continuation shows interest and dedication in geocaching.

I know there are both hiders and seekers and don't want to squelch the enthusiasm of either. We need both to make this work. Good hiders become that way from experience...experience from the geocaching workshops, learning from other geocachers, and just being out on the trails.
View user's profile Send private message
Green Bay Paddlers
WGA Member

Joined: 2003-10-12
Posts: 346
Location: Green Bay, WI

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:11 am Reply with quote Back to top

I'm all for limiting placements to one cache a week placed during the spring/summer/fall months.

The hobby can certainly grow even with those numbers. In addition, it will encourage those to place caches during the non-peak times of year (winter).

Just my thoughts...
View user's profile Send private message
Cheesehead Dave
WGA Member

Joined: 2002-04-06
Posts: 1031
Location: Kenosha, WI

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:23 am Reply with quote Back to top

I agree that our approvers do a lot. When I hid my first cache, we had only one approver, at it took four hours between hitting the submit button and the cache having its first find! Lately, I've never had to deal with 2-3 week waiting times for caches; the average seems to be a day or two which is borderline between "just right" and "Mrs. Cheesehead is going to throw out my computer if I check my email one more time to see if my cache has been approved yet". Image

I think trying coming to a consensus for a guideline for how many caches someone should be able to place in a period of time will be about as successful as a guideline for how many caches a person should find before they hide their first cache. It will be different for everybody.

I think there are plenty of people who would volunteer to be reviewers, either as primary reviewers or as backups for when the primaries need a break. I also don't see why those people would have to be board members, although it would certainly be useful for them to at least be WGA members so that everyone is on the same page with our state hiding guidelines.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Joined: 2003-09-10
Posts: 1263
Location: Bristol WI

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:34 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Everyone has very good points. While adding approvers may serve as a temporary solution, I can't help but to ask....
If the WGA can come up with our own state guidelines that would result in an increase of well thought out cache placements across the state, shouldn't this should be proposed to Jeremy Irish by the WGA board?

Much of the purpose of having an association such as ours is to guide the sport in a positive direction. The people that have been around for the long haul have a good idea what they like. Why sit and talk amongst ourselves when we could be doing something that will make a change for the better?

View user's profile Send private message
WGA Member

Joined: 2006-01-04
Posts: 14
Location: Cecil, WI

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Here are my thoughts, I agree with a limited number of placements, either a max number per month per team, or a max limit at submittal. Or even a minimum number of finds prior to placing your own.

I have to agree also that how many Gc's can a team really maintain, I not bashing anyone, many keep well maintained GC's, I am worried about the newbie that is gun-ho now and places 1.1 million film canisters and then bails the sport in a year.

Too bad there wasnt a way to meet some criteria prior to submitting, something that could tell you when you submit that you are to close to a exsisting cache or would tell you that you to close to road or tracks. I guess that would be quite a database to build, just a thought.

If the lead time for approval is going to stay on the long side, perhaps give everyone a submittal number to tell you how many are if front of you, or even tell you a number of days till your is reviewed.

Ok Im done.
View user's profile Send private message
WGA Member

Joined: 2005-04-07
Posts: 303
Location: Silver Lake, WI USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:57 am Reply with quote Back to top

I've stated on more than one occasion that I think our approvers are doing a good job. They have a lot to deal with in this mess. And let's not forget that they have lives of their own. Jobs, family, friends, with any luck some time on the trails...

Do I think they need help? Absolutely! They are doing what they can, and if their progression doesn't suit some, they catch grief for it. With the numbers of cachers increasing, and the desire for hiding caches on the rise, why shouldn't they have some help. And it's not because they are being lax, it's because times and demands are changing and growing.

I'm not sure that I agree with "part time help"...I think if someone else is going to become an approver, they should get in there full time like the other guys. As stated so many times in this thread, one can only get stronger with experience. Shouldn't this apply to the approvers as well as the hiders? The more one does the job, the easier it will become for them. Having people "floating" in and out of the position is not such a great idea. There wouldn't be any consistency.

As for the new approver being a WGA Board member, I say NO WAY! The WGA Board has enough to do already. And while this may tick some off, I'd like to remind people AGAIN that WGA members do not make up the complete body of cachers in our state. Yes, there are those who think the WGA should "govern" all that is WI Geocaching, but I say that's not how it is. Groundspeak fact, they do it in many states and countries...check out their site at www dot geocaching dot com. And from what I've seen, they're pretty good at it!

As much as it stinks, there are hundreds of people out there who want nothing to do with the WGA. They just want to seek and/or hide caches. Why not find someone who has time to sit in front of their computer every day. Someone who is willing to follow the guidelines set forth by Groundspeak. It DOESN'T have to be a WGA Board Member. It doesn't even have to be a WGA member. I would like it to be someone who is out there on the trails though. Someone who has first hand knowledge of how the sport is changing and growing. Someone with experience as both a seeker and a hider. If Groundspeak, after reviewing the possible candidates for approver, decides to make it a board member, then that's their idea...not ours!

Brian and Brian, thanks again for doing what you can. Sorry if some give you a hard time about "being slow" when approving caches. I have to ask one thing, how much time could you guys save if the hider did their research right before submitting the cache to you for approval?

Originally posted by Geojiggs:
Too bad there wasnt a way to meet some criteria prior to submitting, something that could tell you when you submit that you are to close to a exsisting cache or would tell you that you to close to road or tracks. I guess that would be quite a database to build, just a thought.

While it is up to the approvers to "check" this out before approving a cache, the above mentioned are all things that the placer is responsible for researching prior to submitting. That's where mapping comes in. By running a query of the hide area you can place your cache on the same file and check distance there. Your GPSR's mapping should also show you where tracks and roads are. Mapsend and Mapsource both have this ability, as do so many other programs. If the hider hasn't coughed up the $30 for membership, they should either do it or use the old fashioned method of mapping from one location on Groundspeak, loading the GPSR, uploading this info to the computer, adding their waypoint to their software, checking the distances, then submitting...oh heck...just cough up the 30 bucks and make it easier on yourself!

I'm done for now...sorry if I repeated someone else, sorry if I overstated something, sorry...oh forget it, we all know I'm not sorry about speaking my mind! Image Image

View user's profile Send private message
LightningBugs Mum
WGA Member

Joined: 2004-09-26
Posts: 1604
Location: Fort Atkinson, WI

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:15 am Reply with quote Back to top

I agree that it is time for another approver and it doesn't have to be a WGA board member.

But where are we going to find somebody else named Brian?

View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:       
Post new topic   Reply to topic

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001-2008 phpBB Group
:: Theme & Graphics by Daz :: Ported for PHP-Nuke by ::
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Forums ©
Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Parental Consent Form | contact | Comments ]

All content © 2013 Wisconsin Geocaching Association, except comments and forum entries which are property of their posters.

The Groundspeak Geocaching Logo is a registered trademark of Groundspeak, Inc. Used with permission.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the WGA Terms of Use

Distributed by Raven PHP Scripts
New code written and maintained by the RavenNuke™ TEAM

(Original PHP-Nuke Code Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi)
Page Generation: 0.11 Seconds

:: fisubice phpbb2 style by Daz :: PHP-Nuke theme by ::
:: fisubice Theme Recoded To 100% W3C CSS & HTML 4.01 Transitional & XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance by RavenNuke™ TEAM ::

:: W3C CSS Compliance Validation :: W3C HTML 4.01 Transitional Compliance Validation :: W3C XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance Validation ::