waiting for review

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:42 pm

if thats the case their being way picky

I mean if thats whats up ill go move it 6 ft i guess. rolls eyes

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:50 pm

Error3 wrote:

what?

Is the cache in your back yard or at the dead end?

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:00 pm

well if rail distance is the problem I hope they tell me soon so I can go fix it.

I suppose its at the dead end, I live on the other side of town

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:04 pm

This is actually odd...Google Maps shows the cache north of the tracks...my maps and Google Earth show it South of the tracks...

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:06 pm

its south of the rail

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:07 pm

Error3 wrote:

its south of the rail

It is possible this strange mapping issue might be part of the problem....but again that is speculation.

I have never seen the maps show such different locations before...very interesting.

WGA Member Joined: 2007-02-03 Posts: 2209

There were over a dozen caches published last night. As caches are submitted for approval they are put in que in the order recieved. There could be 20 in front of yours. The reviewers don't clear the board every night. I think you need to be a little more considerate of what they do. They are just regular geocachers like me and you that have families and jobs and do the reviewing for no pay in their spare time.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:32 pm

there were only 8

reviewers should be paid since you have to pay to join

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:48 pm

Error3 wrote:

there were only 8

reviewers should be paid since you have to pay to join

.....And Groundspeak should pay us for placing caches and creating the webpage listings....but unfortunately that isn't how it works.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:19 pm

Patience is a virtue! Please keep in mind that reviewers are volunteers, most likely have a full time job and they have a life too. Ain't there something that states when you publish a cache that it may not get "published" right away. It may take up to a week. Maybe a better approach would be asking the reviewers by email if there is a problem with the cache instead of bashing them in public.

Just my 2 cents worth.

WGA Member Joined: 2007-02-03 Posts: 2209

The caches being published right now were hidden today so there might be a problem with yours. You might want to contact the reviewers.