Home › Forums › Geocaching in Wisconsin › Announcements › 2005 Cache of the Year
This topic contains 20 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by
The Lil Otter 19 years, 10 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
01/02/2006 at 6:47 pm #1719948
Please vote now for the 2005 Cache of the Year. You can find the voting form on the Cache of the Year page.
Link to Cache of the Year Page
The 12 Cache of the Month winners in 2005 are eligible for this honor… with all these great caches it will be hard to select a single one as being the “best of the best” (but you’ll have try!).
Voting will be closed on January 31st.
[This message has been edited by jvechinski (edited 01-02-2006).]
01/10/2006 at 6:49 pm #1738683bump
23 votes. Is that all the people that log onto the WGA site and forums? I think we can get a few more.
Encourage your fellow geocaching friends to vote too. There has to be at least one cache on that list that more people have done that they could vote for.
These caches need you!
01/10/2006 at 7:29 pm #1738684I’m holding my vote for now in hopes of getting one or two more done before having to chose before the end of the month. Anyone out there want to head up to Appleton on the 23rd? (yeah, it’s a Monday, but the kids are out of school.)
Team LightningBugs
* * * * * * * * * *01/26/2006 at 3:56 pm #1738685Bump.
A friendly reminder that voting for Cache of Year will be closing on Tuesday, January 31st… so get your votes in!
01/31/2006 at 11:28 pm #1738686One last bump. We currently have a tie for Cache of the Year… I’m sure one of the two leaders would appreciate an (unlucky) 13th vote.
02/01/2006 at 12:21 am #1738687Do you mean only 12 people voted?
02/01/2006 at 12:36 am #1738688quote:
Originally posted by pcfrog:
Do you mean only 12 people voted?No, the two leading candidates had 12 votes a piece… by my count, 50 votes have been cast for Cache of the Year so far.
And now the two leaders are tied at 13 each.
02/01/2006 at 3:49 am #1738689I have no clue if I voted or not. My vote never shows in red (or whatever) like it says it should.
Is there any sort of fix for this? I don’t want to vote twice. and so sometimes I don’t vote at all (only because I can’t remember if I voted before.)
Bec
02/01/2006 at 4:17 am #1738690Just checked and yes, greyhounder, you cast an early ballot on 01-01-06.
I’ve been keeping an eye on this one because of the close race so even if you voted again, I’d catch you in the act and be forced to put you before the COTY Tribunal to plead your case.
Team GeoPink
– Jeff
Co-conspirator to make the world a better place…The comments and opinions above are those solely of Team GeoPink (arcangl7) and are not those of the WGA, the WGA board, or its other fine members.
02/01/2006 at 4:23 am #1738691quote:
Originally posted by arcangl7:
Just checked and yes, greyhounder, you cast an early ballot on 01-01-06.I’ve been keeping an eye on this one because of the close race so even if you voted again, I’d catch you in the act and be forced to put you before the COTY Tribunal to plead your case.
But I would have brought yummy chocolate chip cookies to the tribunal…..
I voted so early! Obviously I wasn’t recoving from anything exciting from New Year’s Eve.
Bec
02/01/2006 at 4:27 am #1738692But I would have brought yummy chocolate chip cookies to the tribunal…..
Just promise to bring them to the board meeting when you get elected and I might look the other way…
Team GeoPink
– Jeff
Co-conspirator to make the world a better place…The comments and opinions above are those solely of Team GeoPink (arcangl7) and are not those of the WGA, the WGA board, or its other fine members.
02/01/2006 at 7:20 am #1738693quote:
Originally posted by greyhounder:
I have no clue if I voted or not. My vote never shows in red (or whatever) like it says it should.Is there any sort of fix for this? I don’t want to vote twice. and so sometimes I don’t vote at all (only because I can’t remember if I voted before.)
Yes, there was a “bug” where the cache name was sometimes not being highlighted in red after a vote was cast. Miata let me know about this and it was fixed a week or two ago.
I can tell you that you won’t be able to vote for COTM/COTY twice in the future, will have information on which cache you voted for, and have the capability to delete your vote and vote for a different cache.
02/01/2006 at 1:30 pm #1738694quote:
Originally posted by jvechinski:
Yes, there was a “bug” where the cache name was sometimes not being highlighted in red after a vote was cast. Miata let me know about this and it was fixed a week or two ago.I can tell you that you won’t be able to vote for COTM/COTY twice in the future, will have information on which cache you voted for, and have the capability to delete your vote and vote for a different cache.
What the heck are you doing up and posting at 1:06 AM???? Sheesh!
02/01/2006 at 1:39 pm #1738695Can we see a list of caches and the votes they received? I know it was close, and I’m interested in how so….
02/01/2006 at 6:42 pm #1738696At 12:00 AM, Bob and I pulled the list and saved it as a Word Doc. At this point the voting should have been over, so it should be accurate. Anyone interested in what we saved can e-mail the request to us @ meheula at wi dot rr dot com. We’ll e-mail it to you. Or, one can simply wait for the “official” results to be posted. Hopefully that won’t take long.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.