› Forums › Geocaching in Wisconsin › Help › stupid logging question

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 06/29/2004 at 10:23 pm #1720118
    Astro_D

      I was out looking for a cache (Up the River). 300 feet from the cache location, I was stopped by a newly formed inpassable river from the torrential rains.

      I posted a note saying I could not proceed to the cache due to high water and would be back to try again. I did not log it as a DNF as I was 300 feet away and was not able to actually look for the cache.

      Was I correct in posting the note or should I have posted it as a DNF? The other team I was with posted this as a DNF. I was just wondering about the protocal.

      Thanks for helping to clear this up.
      Kat

      06/29/2004 at 11:08 pm #1739896
      Cathunter

        Seeing that you didn’t really have the opportunity to look for it, I think a note is fine.

        Remember, if you can cross the water without facing death, there is no excuse for not finding the cache.

        06/29/2004 at 11:11 pm #1739897
        bnb

          If I never actually get to the cache site to look for the cache, I post a note. If I look for the cache at what I think is ground zero and don’t find it, I post a DNF.

          When I’m searching for a cache that has DNF’s, I won’t look as long if I can’t find it. If I posted a DNF on something that I never even looked for, it would be giving a false impression to someone that uses that information the same way I do.

          This log is an example of both.

          06/30/2004 at 12:57 am #1739898
          subterranean

            In my opinion, you should have posted a DNF. The sole purpose of purple frowny faces is to alert other cachers and the owner that there may be a problem with the cache. If the area of the cache is blocked by a raging river, that’s a problem that I’d certainly like to know about before heading out after the cache myself. Your note may get the message across, but a DNF log is much more likely to get my attention.

            Matt

            06/30/2004 at 12:49 pm #1739899
            Cachew

              I concur with the notion of posting a note. If I never get close enough to look for it, then I haven’t NOT found it! I recently got stopped by high water after a .5 mile hike – and still had .3 miles to go. Posted a note to that effect!

              06/30/2004 at 1:54 pm #1739900
              GrouseTales

                If I’m not able to get close enough to actually perform a search, then I would just write a note. If I’ve actually searched “ground zero” and couldn’t find it, then I would leve a DNF.

                There has been many occasions where I’ve aborted a cache hunt once in the general area. In these cases I’ve only left “notes”. I don’t leave a DNF unless I’ve exhausted all attempts to find the cache at the posted coordinates.

                Bottom line, do whatever you feel comfortable doing

                07/05/2004 at 4:13 pm #1739901
                sbukosky

                  Can’t get to it? Post a note.
                  Searched for it but couldn’t find it? DNF.

                  If the cache is easy to find once you overcome all the obsticals, such as my Lowe’s Lake #1, posting a DNF if you gave up because of the water could discourage other’s by making them think the cache is hard to find rather than just hard to get to.

                • Author
                  Posts
                Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.