Home › Forums › Archived Forums › Old General Forum (Busted) › number of finds no longer listed?
This topic contains 11 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  arffer 23 years, 1 month ago.
- 
		AuthorPosts
- 
		
			
				
09/15/2002 at 10:56 pm #1720896It appears the number of finds a cacher has are no longer listed on the individual cache pages. Did I miss an announcement about this somewhere in the geocaching.com forums? I just looked and did not see anyone else discussing it. 09/15/2002 at 11:26 pm #1744993I just noticed that myself. Don’t care for it, really. I enjoy seeing the number of finds next to cacher(s) names. They also changed some information on the bottom the cache location pages as well. 09/16/2002 at 1:13 am #1744994Here’s the announcement. 09/16/2002 at 1:39 am #1744995quote: 
 Originally posted by CacheCows:
 Here’s the announcement.Yup. I saw it a short while ago. Can’t say that I care for this change, but hey, life goes on. 09/16/2002 at 2:44 am #1744996quote: 
 Originally posted by kbraband:
 Originally posted by CacheCows: 
 Here’s the announcement.Yup. I saw it a short while ago. Can’t say that I care for this change, but hey, life goes on. We noticed too. We liked seeing the number of finds by the cacher’s name 09/16/2002 at 3:31 am #1744997IMHO, the performance improvement on the geocaching.com site that resulted from making the cache pages static is wonderful. While I also certainly liked seeing the number of finds on the logs, I’m certainly willing to loose them for the sake of getting such a performance improvement. Its easy enough to click on the cacher’s name to see their profile if we’re really interested in seeing how many finds they have. 09/16/2002 at 6:10 pm #1744998I notices the change in format but not in performance. Maybe my PC is getting dated. 09/17/2002 at 12:45 am #1744999Alan, do you know what’s up with html links in the cache pages? I put several links in my OIT Trailside cache page, but after Jeremy made his aforementioned updates this past Sunday, the links no longer work. I had to delete the “http://” portion of the URLs so the whole page didn’t get messed up, but now visitors will have to cut and paste those addresses into their browers instead of clicking on the links. 09/17/2002 at 1:10 am #1745000Links in logs still work, but make sure you end them with a space before any punctuation. The log formatter places some formatting after the link, and if there is no space the link gets confused. Post or email me an example of one of your messed up logs if you like, and I’ll take a look. Or just try reposting the log ending the link with a space. BTW, just type in the link, no html tags are needed. [This message has been edited by CacheCows (edited 09-16-2002).] 09/17/2002 at 4:46 am #1745001quote: 
 Originally posted by CacheCows:
 Links in logs still work, but make sure you end them with a space before any punctuation. The log formatter places some formatting after the link, and if there is no space the link gets confused. Post or email me an example of one of your messed up logs if you like, and I’ll take a look. Or just try reposting the log ending the link with a space. BTW, just type in the link, no html tags are needed.[This message has been edited by CacheCows (edited 09-16-2002).] OK, the space was the problem. I went in and fixed it. Thanks for the advice. (BTW, it worked fine for several days and then suddenly was messed up starting Sunday evening. Weird.) 09/17/2002 at 6:32 pm #1745002I see that the number of finds has now been restored! Looks like people really missed it as much as I did! Ya gotta keep up with how many Lil Otter is up to . quote: 
 Originally posted by kbraband:
 It appears the number of finds a cacher has are no longer listed on the individual cache pages. Did I miss an announcement about this somewhere in the geocaching.com forums? I just looked and did not see anyone else discussing it.[This message has been edited by Miata (edited 09-17-2002).] 09/17/2002 at 6:59 pm #1745003You just have to remember that the count displayed on a log is only as accurate as the last time that cache page was updated. If a cache does not see any activity, all the counts on all of the logs will be laging behind. But its better than nothing 
- 
		AuthorPosts
The forum ‘Old General Forum (Busted)’ is closed to new topics and replies.
 
		



