› Forums › Geocaching in Wisconsin › Help › Opinions Needed – State Park program
- This topic has 11 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 9 months ago by
Ry and Ny.
-
AuthorPosts
-
04/14/2008 at 3:01 pm #172637204/14/2008 at 3:43 pm #1887827
Re: Use of real Perms….I would use temps. I think if the park is interested in setting up a class of sorts it would also be OK with the set up of a few temps which would be allowed to stay in place. Granted then these hides would not be listed on GC to use for demonstration purposes, but you could always make a mock up (on paper) of a real GC page with the temp information substituted for the location of an actual geocache. I’d hate to see your Perms go AWOL.
04/14/2008 at 4:02 pm #1887828I’m not sure how your event went on Saturday, but the problem with using permanents in general is that they are just too far apart for a “class”. You really want to expose people to several types of hides, and unless you start early, it will be difficult to reach them all.
That said, I wouldn’t think the typical state park visitor is going to muggle your caches. The best is probably to provide guidance for finding the temps and then give them a list of the permanents in the park and let them find them on their own.
04/14/2008 at 4:15 pm #1887829Honestly, I think it’s making a mountain out of a molehill. If the ranger is asking you to provide the classes, you will have the opportunity to explain the permanent and renewable nature of geocaching and stress that caches need to be returned for everyone to enjoy. While we all see the results of muggled caches, I have to believe that, in most cases, it’s ignorance rather than willfull thievery that causes this to happen.
Almost every cache I’ve ever seen has some sort of “official Geocache” label in or on it somewhere with a link to gc.com. If it were willful, I think you’d see a lot more situations where one cache gets muggled, closely followed by 3/4 of the caches in the vicinity. I just don’t see that happen very often.
If anything, I’d get everyone set up quickly on gc.com at the start of the class/walk, then lead them on the walk. Have them find the caches, then go back to the start and let them log those caches on the spot. It should only add a small amount of time and will let everyone get their e-peen rewards from finding the caches on the walk.
I think by doing perm caches and taking everyone through the entire experience from registering to logging will help ensure their respect for the hobby.
04/14/2008 at 4:27 pm #1887830Sounds like a great oppourtunity to spread the word about geocaching! And I agree with Lostby7 about using temps for the classes, for the same reasons.
I do not know of where you can get them at a discount. I do know that Best Buy just donated $50,000 to the MN DNR for their geocaching program, which also includes classes in 6 “demonstration” state parks and a single new cache in each of their 72 state parks. So, I would try your local Best Buy first, and see if they want to donate something for the program to the park. Maybe mentioning to them that you know that Best Buy corporate just donated 50K in MN would help them see it as a good idea.
zuma
04/14/2008 at 4:37 pm #1887831I was busy working in the yard thinking about this one. I was going to write exactly what Lostby7 said. Some Boyscouts in Hartland recently had an event in Hartland just for the Scouts. They were going to use permanent caches in the area, two of which were mine. I was a bit worried as they would later be telling their friends about the caches and who knows what would happen next. Luckily they went with temps for the day. The only thing that I don’t like about your idea is now there may not be another event by you at HB and we were looking forward to it. If any veteran geocachers are hesitant to attend basics class events go to Energysavres. We attended and despite a day of caching in the rain this rates as one of the better events that we have attended. We had 11 finds, hot dogs and brownies. The only thing missing was sun.
04/14/2008 at 4:46 pm #1887832I too feel that using regular existing caches for a Geocaching Basics class do increase their exposure to being muggled.
We have been trying to use a mix of both regular caches and some unique temp hides to show people what they could expect to find geocaching at our classes.
For this coming Saturday, we opted not to use all the regular caches for this reason.
AuntieNae
04/14/2008 at 5:15 pm #1887833I like the idea of temps to display unique situations, but I’m still not sold on the idea of boycotting real caches for the muggle factor. I do know that if I were attending something of this nature, I’d get the impression that the presenter was being somewhat elitist by not letting us search for the real thing.
04/14/2008 at 5:38 pm #1887834@Ry and Ny wrote:
I like the idea of temps to display unique situations, but I’m still not sold on the idea of boycotting real caches for the muggle factor. I do know that if I were attending something of this nature, I’d get the impression that the presenter was being somewhat elitist by not letting us search for the real thing.
If you would attend a basics class you would see how clueless some of the attendees are. Also everyone who attends does not become addicted. Those of us who own hides ( I have over 50) value them and we have all had some muggled. Without the geocachers who put caches out there there would be none to look for. A minority of the WGA members own the majority of the caches hidden and pride ourselves in providing quality well maintained caches. The responsibility of owning a cache is non ending and sometimes I’ll spend half a day just visiting my own hides to check on them. Once you have hidden a cache this is much easier to understand.
04/14/2008 at 6:03 pm #1887835All the points of view thus far make sense … thanks, keep the comments/ideas coming!
I agree with everything that is being said … which makes it hard to decide 😯 … but at least I have time to ponder all this, and for you all to influence me 😉
A little reverse-feedback: I agree that most people that would attend a demonstration like this would “respect” the caches and let them be. I guess this is the likely “problem” scenario that I had in mind: The Jones are camping for a week, the whole family attends the demonstration, the next day the family is playing at the beach, 7 year old Bobby Jones starts telling some other kid on beach (Louie) about what they did yesterday, since a cache is nearby Bobby volunteers to Louie to see the cache. Since Louie and family didn’t attend the demo Louie doesn’t understand caching. Louie decides later to come back and take the cache or decides that maybe it would be fun to move it to a different spot. No one means any harm … but the newness of the concept combined with the amount of days spent in close proximity to the caches is more likely to open up a permanent cache to disappearing.
Now one answer, is to make sure the caches I lead them to are in less traveled areas (ie. lead them to the “creepy woods” instead of the “edge of the beach”). At the moment, I see the benefit of using both … maybe two permanent caches, with a couple of temps filling the walking gap in between them, so the little ones don’t lose interest.
04/14/2008 at 6:23 pm #1887836WE teach a monthly class at the school to 4th, 5th and 6th graders. We always put out two temps for that, but hand out the info on the two premanents that are on the school grounds. So using temps in this situation works well for us.
TE04/14/2008 at 6:36 pm #1887837@Mister Greenthumb wrote:
@Ry and Ny wrote:
I like the idea of temps to display unique situations, but I’m still not sold on the idea of boycotting real caches for the muggle factor. I do know that if I were attending something of this nature, I’d get the impression that the presenter was being somewhat elitist by not letting us search for the real thing.
If you would attend a basics class you would see how clueless some of the attendees are. Also everyone who attends does not become addicted. Those of us who own hides ( I have over 50) value them and we have all had some muggled. Without the geocachers who put caches out there there would be none to look for. A minority of the WGA members own the majority of the caches hidden and pride ourselves in providing quality well maintained caches. The responsibility of owning a cache is non ending and sometimes I’ll spend half a day just visiting my own hides to check on them. Once you have hidden a cache this is much easier to understand.
Please don’t assume I don’t understand just because I haven’t hidden a cache or had a cache muggled. I have experienced similar losses in other hobbies, some that involved far more investment of time and resources than all but the most advanced cache. I’m talking a few hundred dollars investment and months of 2 to 4 hour days as an investment only to have it come to naught by the carelessness of another. As with many endeavors, one does not have to have participated in the exact situation to understand the gravity of it or even empathize with the consequences of the careless or malicious actions of others.
I would certainly expect that many would not become addicted. I would also expect some people to be clueless walking in. Heck, I was clueless walking into this and I’m not sure if I’m addicted or not. I’m having fun, but am not going through tremors if I don’t get to go seeking on a weekend. However, even if I had only gone and found one, I think it’s still human nature for the vast majority of people to respect others’ property, especially in the event that an explanation just as you gave is given to those who are participating in a class. For those to whom it is not their nature, the battle has been lost as soon as the words “geocaching.com” leave your lips or appear on a class syllabus.
After all, in the end, almost by definition, if you’re giving a demonstration you’re handing the potential new geocachers AND the potential muggles all of the tools they need to either be productive geocachers or to wreak havoc on all caches both in the park and in their own neighborhoods, whether you use existing real caches or just temp caches. Let’s face it, the actual work spent in going to gc.com to download the coordinates for the closest 500 caches to your zip code is less taxing than the effort it takes to go and and walk to one cache, whether you’ve already been there or not.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.