› Forums › Geocaching in Wisconsin › General › Useless Hints
- This topic has 21 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
Todd300.
-
AuthorPosts
-
08/09/2009 at 9:38 pm #1728657
Ok, so I’m stealing the idea for this topic from a regional geocaching section on Geocaching (original topic link: http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=204575&hl=)
So, what is the worst/most useless hint you have come across??
For us we really don’t like tucked in, yeah, we know it being a micro will most likely be tucked in, but come on in a forest with tons of trees laying down and hollow?? Plus the gps is bouncing around so we aren’t even sure that we are close to the g.z.!!
That’s one of our pet peeve hints.
08/09/2009 at 10:11 pm #1912247“Send in reinforcements.”
This hint makes no sense until you find it.
(Sorry GMO) 🙂08/09/2009 at 10:51 pm #1912248First Prize: “None needed.”
Runners Up:
“Not yet”
“Will give hint after the FTF” (still there years later)
“In the rocks” (well DUH!!!)
“Check out my cache GCXXXXX. It’s awesome!”
“Be sure to park at 123 Main Street” (with no parking coordinates given)
On the Left Side of the Road...08/09/2009 at 11:00 pm #1912249I’ve got you all topped…..
Hint: 20 feet south of the only White Pine, in a hole of the maple tree about 4 feet off of the ground marked with a red spot above the hole.
08/10/2009 at 12:26 am #1912250@gotta run wrote:
First Prize: “None needed.”
Runners Up:
“Not yet”
“Will give hint after the FTF” (still there years later)
“In the rocks” (well DUH!!!)
“Check out my cache GCXXXXX. It’s awesome!”
“Be sure to park at 123 Main Street” (with no parking coordinates given)
That is the most infuriating hint! Yeah, like I have Internet access while out on the trail. And even if I did, it probably would be of no help.
08/10/2009 at 12:34 am #1912251Typical Hide.
08/10/2009 at 12:52 am #1912252Kept running into Pmuts last year in Indiana, it only took us 3-4 of these to realize Pumts is Stump backwards. Ok I may have been slow that day also
08/10/2009 at 3:23 am #1912253For me, the ultimate bad hint was on a rockpile hide in Racine, with the wonderful hint “Across the street from Lee’s Deli.”
08/10/2009 at 1:16 pm #1912254‘Tucked in’ is our least favorite. Dick actually talked to the cache owner about it, when he asked why I didn’t go along to hunt for his hides, and he stopped using that….except one time.
He called Dick and said, “I’ve got one for Gwyn. The clue is “not tucked in but cleverly concealed!”
At least he has a sense of humor about it! 😉
08/10/2009 at 2:37 pm #1912255Zuma and I ran into a classic in southwest Iowa… “First look with your GPS, then with your eyes.” 🙄
08/10/2009 at 2:42 pm #1912256We’ve also come across “hidden” and “look hard”
On the Left Side of the Road...08/10/2009 at 3:04 pm #1912257“This one is too easy for a hint”
08/10/2009 at 3:15 pm #1912258Also, not really a “useless” hint but more frustrating–not putting enough information on the cache page to solve a puzzle in the first place and then adding/changing hints over time to add necessary info. 🙄
On the Left Side of the Road...08/10/2009 at 5:12 pm #1912259@gotta run wrote:
Also, not really a “useless” hint but more frustrating–not putting enough information on the cache page to solve a puzzle in the first place and then adding/changing hints over time to add necessary info. 🙄
This is theoretically not within the guidelines, although sometimes the reviewers miss things like this. Sometimes a puzzle will look straightforward, only to be proven unsolvable (or with multiple correct solutions). Generally we just glance at sudokus, math problems, trivia quizzes, etc. The ones that get our attention are encryptions, logic puzzles, and those caches where the puzzle doesn’t seem to exist at all.
Returning the thread back to its originally scheduled topic…
08/10/2009 at 5:56 pm #1912260Hint : Balsam
Gee, which balsam tree? And like I can identify a balsam. Riiiiiiiiight.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.