Forums Geocaching in Wisconsin General Border defences

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1729181

    As a off shoot of Muther & Sun’s outling counties in mid state Illinois, I wonder if anyone has thought to outline their state?

    Would take a fairly large number of caches getting together and ….. oooh, dare I say this … cooperating!?

    #1917290
    JimandLinda
    Participant

      Glad we live in the middle! 😯

      #1917291

      oh heck no..not another challenge…

      #1917292

      @RSplash40 wrote:

      oh heck no..not another challenge…

      Just say “No” Mike…

      #1917293
      JimandLinda
      Participant

        I’m still waiting for a group of cachers to hide caches representing the 88 keys on a piano! 🙄

        #1917294

        I like your idea Marc.. Would these be .1 miles away from each other as well if possible?

        #1917295

        If you decide to do this I will do my part. I can get Western Walworth County.

        #1917296

        @JimandLinda wrote:

        Glad we live in the middle! 😯

        Shhhhhhhhhhh not so loud……..or he might think of outlining every county as well as the whole state.

        #1917297

        Counties, state, piano keys …. all great ideas!

        Come on folks, get a hidin’!

        #1917298

        Seriously…what’s the point to this?? I think its absolutely stupid.

        #1917299

        @AstroD-Team wrote:

        Seriously…what’s the point to this?? I think its absolutely stupid.

        ” “

        😀

        Disclaimer : Always answering to a higher power.

        #1917300

        @AstroD-Team wrote:

        Seriously…what’s the point to this?? I think its absolutely stupid.

        Did you not just go hunting around Milwaukee for 100 caches in a 10 x 10 grid? 😯

        #1917301

        @AstroD-Team wrote:

        Seriously…what’s the point to this?? I think its absolutely stupid.

        I think that EVERY NON- Geocacher thinks this of geocaching.

        #1917302

        @AstroD-Team wrote:

        Seriously…what’s the point to this?? I think its absolutely stupid.

        LOL……This is obviously a difference in viewpoint, and I am not sure the opposite views will ever come to a common agreement.

        An analogy one might make is that many of us who place caches, place them carefully and with thought, the way a chef prepares a great dish, with consideration of spices, texture, and how pleasing it will be to the palate. Many cache placers, place caches to be enjoyed as a single dish, and dont expect people to rush thru them like in a contest of how many hot dogs one can stuff in one’s mouth in an hour.

        The conflict in viewpoint arises because there are two distinct styles of caching. First, there is the type where one really is trying to get as many finds as possible, as if there was a reward or prize to be had for stuffing more hot dogs in your mouth than the other guy.

        Second, there is the type of cacher who gets out and enjoys the great dish served up by the cache placer, enjoys the hide technique, the view and the walk to the location, and savors the moment.

        Which is better? Well, that is a personal choice, we are all free to make for ourselves. Personally, I enjoy both types of caching, but do view them as distinctly different activities, so can offer a few thoughts on the subject, for what it is worth.

        I do think that the history and tradition of geocaching is based on the idea that a cache should take you some place, and should show you something. Caches that I place are all in this vein, and I have yet to place a cache “just for the numbers.” Probably one reason so many of my cache hides end up on the LCG.

        On the other hand, the game has evolved in a way that I dont think that Groundspeak forsaw, where the find count “matters.” If the find count matters, than park and logs are just the ticket. And a second type of cache placer has come in to fill the void, and placed caches that are easy to find, making it easy to rack up a bigger find count. Thank you Mutherandsun! Thank you to the team that put out the Battleship series! and thank you Marc for stepping in to fill a desire that many cachers have: easy to find caches to rack up numbers!

        Now, I am guessing that most of us have a preference, one way or the other. Freedom is a great thing.

        zuma

        #1917303
        bartrod
        Participant

          @zuma wrote:

          @AstroD-Team wrote:

          Seriously…what’s the point to this?? I think its absolutely stupid.

          Many cache placers, place caches to be enjoyed as a single dish, and dont expect people to rush thru them like in a contest of how many hot dogs one can stuff in one’s mouth in an hour.

          zuma

          No hot dogs??! Aw, man 🙁

          Oconto...the birthplace of western civilization:)

        Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.