› Forums › Geocaching in Wisconsin › General › Challenge cache musings
- This topic has 20 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 12 months ago by
CodeJunkie.
-
AuthorPosts
-
02/03/2010 at 2:37 pm #1729516
Challenge caches….some of us love ’em, some of us loathe ’em.
Like puzzles, multis or any other oddity, a person can choose to ignore them.
As owner of a couple of challenge caches, it saddens me to see that some folks will do anything to try and meet the requirements, including hoping to squeak by posted timelines for qualifying caches. The point of caches like that is to SEEK out those truly amazing experiences. If that’s not your thing, just let it go. You don’t have to find them all. No one really cares if you are well rounded, had a busy day, can run up and down the alphabet or take photos of gravestones. Play the game in the spirit of the placer’s intent and you’ll enjoy it more.
Play to win and……you lose.
Done. I know it’s not supposed to be crabby month, but some stuff I’ve seen lately with respect to these kinds of caches, and communications with other challenge owners, makes me want to archive all such listings I own. Life is so much bigger than that. however, so I won’t.
02/03/2010 at 3:11 pm #1921423Your post does not meet the qualifications for a “crabby post”, Gwyn. 😉
We also like to do caches in the spirit the owners have intended. That’s why they placed the caches the way they did. Challenge caches? We’ll do some if we will enjoy meeting the requirements. We’re not well-rounded, nor have we had a busy day and probably won’t. This is just like with any other cache: no matter how great the cache or beautiful the view, if it’s something we don’t want to do (usually the terrain), we’ll take a pass. Still almost another million caches out there to look for.
To us (and to modify a quote), caching’s a journey, not a competition.
02/03/2010 at 8:51 pm #1921424@Trekkin’ and Birdin’ wrote:
Play the game in the spirit of the placer’s intent and you’ll enjoy it more.
Play to win and……you lose.
Wow.
Gwyn, did you hit the nail on the head with your post. I often hear people say that shortcutting “doesn’t hurt anyone” because this is just a game, and on the surface it’s true. But it’s a real slap in the face to the people who HAVE taken the time to honestly complete the challenge, as well as to the owner who has put the time and thought into setting the challenge up.
(By the way, you could also substitute “puzzles” for a number of instances where you say “challenge caches” and have an equally valid complaint (…er, “musings,” sorry Sandlanders). But I won’t go stealing your thread with another one of my diatribes as my thoughts on that issue are pretty well known… 😉 )
On the Left Side of the Road...02/03/2010 at 9:35 pm #1921425No, you can not substitute puzzles for challenges. They are two separate situations.
Your personal opinion about puzzle solving and finding does not require other cachers to do it your way. Stop trying to harass cachers doing it differently than what you want to…..
02/03/2010 at 9:38 pm #1921426To quote Gwyn again, “Play the game in the spirit of the placer’s intent and you’ll enjoy it more.”
A shortcut is a shortcut, and that’s my final word on the matter.
On the Left Side of the Road...02/03/2010 at 9:41 pm #1921427fight nicely now, kids
02/03/2010 at 9:59 pm #1921428Eh, we’re not fighting and it would do no good to argue because either side is entrenched in their position. Plus I said I didn’t want to steal the thread.
So back on the topic of challenge caches, the one good thing about them when it comes to shortcutting is that you as the cache owner have the right to delete the logs from people too lazy to do the cache as it was designed.
It can be a bear keeping up with challenge requirements particularly when there are a lot of underlying caches to keep track of, like in our SCC challenge, but since we knew that when we set it up, it’s a price of diligence we agreed to pay. Fortunately in our case, no one’s tried to circumvent the challenge and everyone seems to enjoy the accomplishment that goes with it.
But then again, even though there are a lot of caches required, it’s nowhere near as difficult to complete as T&B’s “hungry” challenge or others.
On the Left Side of the Road...02/03/2010 at 10:02 pm #1921429I agree. Challenge caches are more fun when done within the guidelines as requested by the placer.
Many challenge caches have the coordinates for the final listed on the page, but I’ve seen a lot of times that a cacher will find and log the cache even though he didn’t do the requirements to find that cache.
Me, I’ll follow the rules of any challenge challenge.
Case in point: there is a challenge cache at Pike Lake State Park called BINGO. Basically a cacher must get all 9 caches on one difficulty level such as 1/1, 1/1.5, 1/2, etc.. I was at Pike Lake when I found the Pike Powder Hike and I knew that BINGO cache was nearby, but because I didn’t meet the requirements to find and log that cache yet, I didn’t make an attempt to look for it. I didn’t even think about finding it, then just log it later when I fill out the requirements. That’s wrong too.
I prefer to play any challenges the way the owner intended it to be.
02/03/2010 at 10:21 pm #1921430@gotta run wrote:
Eh, we’re not fighting and it would do no good to argue because either side is entrenched in their position. Plus I said I didn’t want to steal the thread.
I’ve noticed. It’s just something I’ve wanted to say each time that topic has been brought up. This time it seemed safe. A little good natured teasing without being stuck between the opposing trenches.
Now back to your regularly scheduled topic,
To those who have placed challenge and “six pack” style caches: Thank you. Personally they give the game a little punch by giving me a goal to work towards. I may take my time completing them (sometimes not that much time), but I’ll find them eventually.
02/03/2010 at 10:38 pm #1921431@gotta run wrote:
Eh, we’re not fighting and it would do no good to argue because either side is entrenched in their position. Plus I said I didn’t want to steal the thread.
I think we are fighting. We certainly disagree.
And yes, you did attempt to steal this thread!
02/03/2010 at 11:51 pm #1921432Move it to its own thread and I’ll discuss it if I have nothing better to do, since you’ve gotten your dander all up about this, though I doubt there’s anything I can say that you haven’t heard from me already. Or start a poll–“Cheating Puzzle Caches: ‘OK’ or ‘No Way!'”
On the Left Side of the Road...02/04/2010 at 12:56 am #1921433I guess this means if I drive up to Trekkin’ and Birdin’s part of the state and buy them dinner, I still can’t log a find for T & B’s “How hungry are you?” Challenge. 😆
I think I will start with an easier challenge.
02/04/2010 at 1:02 am #1921434Hey, we’re always up for dinner, LOL. I’ve actually contemplated archiving that one, but not sure Trekkin’s ready to let it go. It would not publish nowadays with the revised challenge guidelines.
But I’d love to have someone complete it, so we can go out to eat again! 🙄
02/04/2010 at 4:47 am #1921435I’d love to complete it! Just to get it off my lists as the nearest cache unfound… and now another by Neshonic.. those do end up on my ignore list actually and one day I plan on hopefully completing the challenges. It is nice to have a few in our area that show up when looking at the maps to hopefully drive us to expand beyond our current area.
02/04/2010 at 4:50 am #1921436Seriously Paul, the greatest gift you can give yourself is permission to not find them all. It is beyond freedom.
And none of it really matters, anyway. We enjoy challenges for the reasons you state, they get us to try new things or visit new places. Often, the push us to seek out caches in really great spots that don’t get tons of action, and those are our favorites. They also stretch our minds with puzzle solving, especially when the weather is crummy!
But there are ones we just ignore and move on.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.