We would also like to thank our Wisconsin reviewers. One or the other always seems to be on duty to get submitted caches published in a timely manner. If we do our homework as cache hiders with regards to placement, proximity, etc., we can make their jobs easier. But if we don’t, or if we forget something, we hear about it, as is their duty to keep us on the straight and narrow, no matter how much we may want to push the envelope with our cache creativity.

And it’s a volunteer job. And sometimes a thankless one. And they do it well. (And they’re real people, too, but you didn’t hear it from me! 😉 )

I saw that article in the latest GC.com e-newsletter also. I commend our Wisconsin reviewers for the job they do. It’s got to be tough trying to keep track of all the issues that can arise throughout the entire state and they do a great job. I also thank them for all the guidance they’ve provided to me when asking a question prior to starting on a cache. It’s nice to know they’re willing to help up front instead of just being a gate keeper with a yes / no switch.

I make a motion we double their pay for next year (4 zeroes to the right of the decimal instead of 2).

I’d like to add my thanks also. You guys do an awesome job and usually it is done very quickly! Thanks for devoting so much of your time to make this game possible for the rest of us.

Big thanks to the reviewers! I haven’t had to contact you, but if it were not for your efforts, caching would dwindle away. Thank you for the time you put into the review process.

You are welcome! Now, step away from the keyboard and get outside!

Those reviewers are nothing but know-it-all jerks who just want to make our lives difficult. Heck, they don’t even have any hides or finds!

(edited because I can’t spell, and I can’t have a poorly spelled rant…)

You let ’em have it Bec!