Forums Archived Forums Candidates Corner 2011 WGA Events & Temporary Caches

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1731358

    Candidates:

    With a full year “under our belts” of WGA events being held without placing Temporary Caches to find and “log” but instead placing many permanent (listed on geocaching.com) caches for each of the WGA events, do you think this was a positive change or a negative one? And why?

    Do you miss the WGA event temps? Even a little?

    If it were to come up for BOD vote again, would you want to continue to place permanent caches for the events or go back to temporary caches? Or perhaps place no caches at all?

    Thanks in advance for your feedback!

    FYI – below is the motion passed during the 2010 BOD Meeting for some history:

    Temp caches
    Whereas the WGA has a long and successful tradition of including the placement of
    temporary caches at our events, initially required because of the absence of adequate
    permanent caches at parks hosting our events in the past. Whereas, with the passage of
    time, the state parks have become more welcoming for large numbers of permanent
    caches to be placed within the state park system. Whereas, the location of our next event,
    Bong Recreational Area currently has about 42 permanent caches present.
    Be it resolved that temporary cache placements at our next event at Bong will be limited
    to be 5 or less children and family focused caches and 25 or less temporary night caches.
    Be it further resolved that the WGA board will review the impact of this modification to
    our event structure immediately following the event at Bong. Be it further resolved that
    WGA events will continue to include the currently used sentence requesting that temps
    not be logged as finds. Be it further resolved that all cache placements for events continue
    to be done in way that is sensitive to the impact of caching on the local eco-system.
    Suggestion made to change motion to read…
    Night cache contest and 5 or less kid and family oriented and accessible caches, with
    respect to environmental sensitivity.
    Ralph points out that the issue involved is that there’s no need for the temps anymore, not
    that we take issue with folks logging on alternate caches.
    Seth seconds.
    Motion passes.

    #1941595

    do you think this was a positive change or a negative one? And why?

    I think moving towards permanent caches was a positive direction for the WGA, In my opinion, if it does not have a GC# it is not a cache, even if it is a great hide, good container, etc.

    Do you miss the WGA event temps? Even a little?
    Not ever attending a WGA event yet, Still can say that I would not want them back. I have found a few at other events and they turned me off from them, they were good hides, but the placements used, would not have passed a reviewer to be published. Is this what you would want a new cacher to find? (actually have found buried caches, caches way to close to each other, and even a step of a multi that could have been considered destruction of property. Val and I usually find the 😀 in the area (usually before or after the event) and use event time to chat and catch up with others. Events in my opinion are more for the comradeship than the numbers

    If it were to come up for BOD vote again, would you want to continue to place permanent caches for the events or go back to temporary caches? Or perhaps place no caches at all?

    my vote would be for permanents or none at all

    #1941596

    Once again, thank you for the question Cheeto.

    As I stated in my candidate’s post that I am an advocate of individuals playing the game as they see fit. Personally, after my first event, I no longer log temporary caches because that is not the way I choose to play. Is it right or wrong? I am not prepared to place judgement on those that do or don’t. As a side note, Geocaching.com DOES allow multiple finds on geocaches as there is nothing in the rules that prevents this. I have this information directly from a Lackey as I was appealing a reviewer’s decision on a puzzle series placement.

    I have mentioned this to emphasize that it really is up to how you want to play the game. As far as the WGA, they have made and passed that motion and that is how they operate their sanctioned events.

    If it were to come up to vote again, my decision would be based on the majority of the members that expressed their opinions to me. Afterall, my representation on the WGA Board is not about what my opinions are, but rather about the opinion of the majority of those I would represent.

    #1941597
    #1941598

    I guess I have answered this question about a million times now, but I suppose new people have not heard my view on the matter, so I will repeat my views one more time.

    First of all, I have no problem with temp caches. Not a bit. Geocaching is a game, and only a game. If some people enjoy placing, finding or logging temp caches, that is their business, and not mine, so I have no problem with any of those activities. People need to remember that the number of finds a person has is just a number. It is not a score. A cacher who has found 1200 caches is not “ahead” of someone who has found 800. Since there is no score in geocaching, it can not be cheating if someone finds and logs a temp geocache. I personally do not log temps, but I do not begrudge how others choose to play the game.

    Second, in the early days of geocaching, temp caches were needed at events, to provide people at events something to look for. So people who found and logged temp caches in the early days of geocaching are not low down dirty cheats, as some would like to suggest. However, temp caches are no longer needed to hold an event. There are plenty of perm caches nearly everywhere now, and it is not really that much more trouble to place a good quality perm cache to support an event than it is to place a temp. So while temp caches were once needed for our events, they are not needed now.

    And third, the WGA was a victim of our own success in placing temp caches. We placed so many temps at our events, that we would have thousands of “attended” logs the day after the event. This was noticed by many people in the geocaching community, and the WGA suffered significant derision as a result. Sadly some cachers viewed the WGA as an organization set up to enable cheaters log a bunch of phony finds. This was never in fact true, but our reputation as a group suffered greatly from this false perception. As a result, the board decided to move away from the practice of logging temps at our events.

    As you point out Cheeto, we have been without temps now for 2 major events. Both were very successful events, though to be honest if you just look at the numbers of how many attended, attendence is down from the peak when people could log 50 – 80 temp caches at the event.

    I continue to support having some very limited temp caches in the future, like it was this past year, with a few “Kids Caches” and some temp night caches. These should not be loggable as finds.

    In short, I have no problem with folks having temps at non-WGA events, even though I do not log them myself. I do however, feel strongly it is important that we safeguard the reputation of the WGA, and will continue to strongly oppose logging temp caches at WGA events.

    zuma

    #1941599

    Another good question.

    My personal practice is I do not log temp caches, but don’t get me wrong they are still fun to find. I believe if it does not have a GC number than it should not be logged. But I would like to see some temp caches come back to events but with cleaver hides. Maybe have people who are known to have very hard finds hide a cache or two and let people at the event find then not log them but have a chance to go find them. I know my first WGA event was a pick nick and my wife and I had a blast looking for the temps. To me an event is to socialize and maybe find a cache or too. I have also encountered some fellow cachers who said they did not like WGA events because of the temps and the craziness that follows where people come extra early and basically run out and try and be the FTF and that’s all they are there for. And ruin it for the rest of the people who show up. That is why they do not come to events any longer. When I tell them the WGA does not have temp caches they said now they might come to an event again and see how it is.

    #1941600
    AuntieNae
    Participant
      #1941601

      Thanks for another good question Shane.

      This is a tough one. This has been an issue here at the WGA since I joined, and I’ve ridden the fence on this one the whole time.

      On one hand, geocaching is what you make of it, and I believe it should be played the way you like it. For those people that feel that this game is about the numbers, then it should be about the numbers for them, and they should be allowed to log temps.

      On the other hand, this subject was debated for a very long time, voted on by the membership, and adopted by the board. Currently, we don’t log temps, and it’s seems thats the way groundspeak would like it as well. If however the membership wants to review this again, I’d support taking another look. Personally, this subject carries no weight with me. I could log temps, or not log temps. If the membership wants it, than they should fight for it and I’ll support whichever decision is made.

      #1941602

      Thank you for the question, Shane.

      When I attended my first event temp caches were placed and at the time I logged multiple attended logs for each cache that I found at the event. As I continued caching, attending events and learning more about caching my attitudes on logging temp caches has evolved. I don’t care all that much if someone logs temp caches but for me on a personal level it has become something I no longer feel right doing.

      Now as for WGA sponsored events and temp caches go I feel that the decision that was made to no longer allow logging of temp caches at our events was the correct decision for the following reasons:

      1. The WGA as an organization really needs to have good working relationships with not only Groundspeak but also with other state geocaching organizations. The multiple attend logs at events had put the WGA and Wisconsin geocachers in a poor light when it came to people outside the state and I feel that the move away from temp caches at events has helped with that.

      2. The placement of permanent caches for WGA events has the added benefit of adding to the quality caches that are placed in the areas where we are holding our events, which not only is good for the event but will also hopefully be enjoyed by geocachers for years to come.

      If elected to the BOD I would have to vote to keep the current policy in place if the issue were ever revisited.

      #1941603

      I believe the move to permanent caches was a positive one. I think having permanent caches has increased the thought in the placement of the caches as well as the appreciation of the finders as a whole. It wasn’t a lot of fun finding a chintzy container with a scratch piece of paper in it, and as others mentioned just standing in line to sign the log.

      Even back in 2008 our SW AZ Geocachers event eliminated temps and replaced with fully published caches. The response was overwhelmingly in favor of them.
      Having permanent caches has meant legitimate spacing, containers, and searches.

      so, no i don’t miss them, and would not like to see them back… at any type of event.

    Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
    • The forum ‘Candidates Corner 2011’ is closed to new topics and replies.