We uploaded a bunch of our caches onto opencaching.com Only because if the site does get more active, we don’t want “other” caches on top or near ours. There doesn’t seem to be much consideration (ie they don’t check) to see if there are all-ready placed caches in the vicinity that are not listed on the opencaching site. They do make the comment that if there is another acche in the area, just place it a bit away to not confuse the two or something to that sort. 🙄 I’ve seen enough caches/letterboxes on top or near each other already – We just want to avoid ‘caches’ from one site “on top” of caches from another site.
I agree with CodeJunkie, it is restrictive. We uploaded a couple of multis, but there is no place I could find, to put in the additional waypoints that is only visible to me and the reviewers. So there is no checks into stages of multis interfering with other caches. I can’t imagine what horrors it must be to upload a puzzle!
We tried Terracaching many years ago. You needed to be sponsored by someone and then be “active” or you got booted out. Well it wasn’t going to work; at the time there were only 3 or 4 in the state and not near us. We got out of that fast. I have no idea how it works today.
Looked into letterboxing, but just not into creating stamps to enjoy it like it’s meant to be. If I want to sign a log, I’ll stick to GC.com.
Have not tried opencaching.us or any other caching service. I just don’t need to create more accounts.
I guess if it gets to be too big an issue with caches on top of caches, we just go back to benchmarking. There seems to be far less confusion doing that. 😆
.
