Forums Geocaching in Wisconsin General Gaming the system

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1733121

    I seem to have run into a mini-epidemic of people intentionally violating the guidelines by placing traditional caches which are not at the listed coordinates. Please note that I am NOT referring to people who do a poor job of measuring their coordinates or accidentally enter the coordinates incorrectly. I am referring to intentional dishonesty. In some cases, people are doing this to place their cache without getting a required permit or permission from a landowner. In other cases, people have done this to place a cache very close to airports, schools, or some other restricted areas. Some people have done this to get around proximity violations, while some others do it just because they think it is funny to give people bad coordinates. This sort of behavior is not acceptable and is considered a violation of the Terms of Use of the geocaching.com website. I would have hoped that people would conduct themselves in geocaching as they would in the rest of their life, that is with honesty and integrity.

    If you have not read the guidelines, please take time to read them before you submit your cache. If you are unsure about how a certain guideline would apply to your cache, please contact Becky or myself to get clarification.

    #1959497

    Very well said!

    #1959498
    raslas
    Participant

      agree-very well said Where is the like button!!

      #1959499

      I am still rather naive I guess. Silly me, the rules say “do this” and I follow them. I didn’t know there was an option to do otherwise

      Following the signals from space.

      #1959500

      WA, our illustrious webmaster has given us a shorter way to say that here: colon, like (small letters), colon

      … as in :like:

      #1959501

      yeah and I goofed it up doing it the hard way too… *sigh*

      Following the signals from space.

      #1959502

      @Walkingadventure wrote:

      I am still rather naive I guess. Silly me, the rules say “do this” and I follow them. I didn’t know there was an option to do otherwise

      :like:

      #1959503

      :like:
      :like:

      oh I get it

      Following the signals from space.

      #1959504

      :like:

      #1959505

      Thread Stealers is leaking again. I’ll look into it.

      #1959506
      huffinpuffin2
      Participant

        @Team Black-Cat wrote:

        Thread Stealers is leaking again. I’ll look into it.

        :like:

        #1959507
        huffinpuffin2
        Participant

          Hypothetically……if one were to stumble across a published geocache, and believe it to be in some sort of violation, should that ‘one’ report such potential violation? And if so, how and to whom? Hypothetically, of course.

          (“creak” goes Pandora’s box)

          #1959508

          This is why all my caches are listed as puzzles, then I can do whatever I want as long as there is some convoluted hippie logic 8) but seriously at least my coords are legit.

          Can we have a blacklist (j/k, kind of) so I can just ignore all of their caches, I know there is a particular IL team that all their hides went on the ignore list.

          #1959509
          BigJim
          Participant

            @huffinpuffin2 wrote:

            Hypothetically……if one were to stumble across a published geocache, and believe it to be in some sort of violation, should that ‘one’ report such potential violation? And if so, how and to whom? Hypothetically, of course.

            (“creak” goes Pandora’s box)

            I have actually run into such a case … a multi-cache published as a traditional so that the CO could avoid filing a DNR notification form. I reported it to a reviewer (WisKid) and he archived the cache and asked me to remove the containers.

            All opinions, comments, and useless drivel I post are mine alone and do not reflect the opinions of the WGA BOD.

            #1959510

            @BigJim60 wrote:

            @huffinpuffin2 wrote:

            Hypothetically……if one were to stumble across a published geocache, and believe it to be in some sort of violation, should that ‘one’ report such potential violation? And if so, how and to whom? Hypothetically, of course.

            (“creak” goes Pandora’s box)

            I have actually run into such a case … a multi-cache published as a traditional so that the CO could avoid filing a DNR notification form. I reported it to a reviewer (WisKid) and he archived the cache and asked me to remove the containers.

            ’cause the DNR form is soooo difficult to file…

            Disclaimer : Always answering to a higher power.

          Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 39 total)
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.