This topic contains 14 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
On the Left Side of the Road...
Well said. I just had a cacher say I needed to give her a “good hint’. Then on another cache she asked for a “real hint”. I think a simple please would have sufficed, she didn’t have to insult me to get information from me.
Not all who wander are lost. -J.R.R. Tolkien
If you send an email through the geocaching site with questions, do not hide your email address–include it so the CO can reply to you by clicking “reply.”
On the Left Side of the Road...And also reference the cache name/number. Some people click on the CO’s name for the profile/address when they are looking at a cache page, and they must think it tells the recipient what page their message came from…
“Can you give me a hint on how to solve this puzzle?”
Which puzzle? 😕
Your doing it again Gotta run. The horse has been thoroughly beaten. We all understand be nice and try solving yourself first.
Have you ever considered some us can’t simply go because of other consideration(like disability or limited funds for trapsing around Green Bay?) or consider, maybe we have tried to solving the puzzle in question and through dumb luck more than your description or “hint”(one that only makes sense after we solve it. Good example of hint that doesn’t really help until after you find it “at the base of a small broken tree” and your in the middle of the forest.
As for complaining about puzzles instead of praising. Some puzzles are unsolvable, by my standards. Example, your time one. Through dumb luck and a hint from a friend that I’m looking in the wrong place did I “solve” it. There is another CO of puzzle caches that tries to be clever but ends up making it unsolvable , again by my standards. Here is a suggestion try solving the puzzle yourself as if you don’t know the answer. Can you find the information needed? Is there to many variables that you can give hints on when a cacher asks. I personally am trying to solve your movie night one and I have most of the answers but apparently not according to your Geochecker.
Here is another hint: Only do the puzzles that you enjoy doing. This is a recreational activity, and if the puzzle is causing you more angst than joy, move along and do a different puzzle.
z
Well you can’t enjoy it if you can’t solve it through rationalization.
I think all the feedback in this thread, such as including GC# and an email address when one asks for help, is good advice and would benefit the WGA membership. Others apparently agree. To each his own I suppose, but I’m more likely to respond quickly if all the info is there rather than making me hunt for it.
The rest is just common courtesy, and thank you to beccaday who commented that it is “well said.”
On the Left Side of the Road...I’ve found myself resolving serveral puzzles lately that I’m either the creator or adopter. More often than not, issues come from reading the information incorrectly but occasionally the everhelpful Wikipedia changes.
A wise CO once told me there has to be a tough one in every puzzle.
Following the signals from space.
@zuma wrote:
Here is another hint: Only do the puzzles that you enjoy doing. This is a recreational activity, and if the puzzle is causing you more angst than joy, move along and do a different puzzle.
z
Excellent point z.
Also, if a puzzle has been solved, it means it is solvable, though perhaps not by everyone.
On the Left Side of the Road...If a puzzle is solved through dumb luck it isn’t solvable because you gave enough or the right hints. By all means put hard parts but still follow the same pattern that the rest of the puzzle. If a hard part is conflicting to the truth or to the puzzle than that will become unsolvable ,to my standards. I love puzzles (suduko, ken ken, research/trivia, physical ones too, but when some one declares something a puzzle and the pattern isn’t there that isn’t a puzzle,by my stanards. What makes it frustrating is when others solve it and when you ask for help you get a cryptic answer that makes no sence.
@hardinfam wrote:
Have you ever considered some us can’t simply go because of other consideration(like disability or limited funds for trapsing around Green Bay?)
This is a constant problem for me. I have puzzles solved all over the US and some abroad. There are also caches up in trees that I’d like to get, but I’m not a good / confident climber.
If I had infinite funds and time, I’d be able to travel to some very unique places and experience some very cool caches. I don’t, so I have to live within my means and accept the fact that I can’t find all the caches I’d like to.
I can empathise with the disability as I know a few cachers that are handicapped in some form. These people make the most of it, but know their limits and exclude the caches that are outside their limits.
I also think Zuma provides great advice
@zuma wrote:Only do the puzzles that you enjoy doing. This is a recreational activity, and if the puzzle is causing you more angst than joy, move along and do a different puzzle.
There are a number of puzzles in the area that I’ve been unable to crack because I’m just not very musically inclined. So be it – I move on to others that I do enjoy.
We have come across more than one “read my mind” puzzle over time. One classic comes to mind and has me thinking of Christmastime… Usually we ignore them.
In the case of our puzzles, all of them have been proven to be solvable by multiple cachers in the method that was intended. Help is always just an email away which, to get back on topic, is the purpose of this thread.
On the Left Side of the Road...The following are some “tips” that have served me well over the last few years when asking for help on various puzzles.
1) GC # / Cache Name Provide both for the CO as I’ve learned from being a puzzle CO myself. This is also great for when a CO responds a few days (or weeks) later and I’m trying to reacquaint myself with which cache it was.
2) What I have assumed about the puzzle type (i.e. it’s an anagram, it’s a soduko, it’s a math puzzle, it’s a trivia puzzle, etc.)
3) What have I tried? Include specifics as applicable because this helps the CO determine if there are multiple sources of information, the math is flawed, the geochecker isn’t working, etc. (I’ve run into all of the above)
4) Ask specific questions. If the question is specific to a particular digit(s) of the solve, please provide the details behind it including any website used, math used, etc. This really helps the CO get right to the point and lets them focus on exactly the portion I’m struggling with.
5) Be as specific as possible when emailing the CO. They are certainly willing to help, but without knowing what I’ve tried, what I’ve assumed, etc. they can’t provide much help.
6) Write a note to the cache page when you solve it and the solve is fresh in your head. Obviously try to avoid spoilers, but feel free to claim victory of the solve prior to actually finding it. I’ve actually had CO’s from outside my normal caching area thank me for the log and allow me to log the puzzle in abstentia (I don’t take the finds, but it shows a little courtesy goes a long way)
7) Be courteous. If you’re group logging a puzzle cache, provide the CO with the common courtesy of telling them (via the log) “XYZ solved it, ABC found it first, but we had a great time caching as a group today.” I’ve had my kids / dad do this when they’re along with me when we find a puzzle they didn’t solve. To me it’s just another courtesy note to acknowledge what really happened.Those are better tips than previously stated.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.