Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2048620
    raslas
    Participant

      If there is a challenge cache on the list but you do not yet qualify for the challenge, but still visit the cache, can you submit it for the LCG.  CO sates on cache page if you do not qualify you may still sign the log as a note and then write the found log when you qualify.

      #2048622

      Is there a challenge cache in the list?

      My thought is that there is no submission option available for the situation you describe. It’s not a find if you don’t qualify. It’s not a revisit unless you have already qualified. It’s not a dnf if you sign the log pre-qualification.  So, unless you adopt it, I don’t believe it can be submitted for points.

      Disclaimer : Always answering to a higher power.

      #2048623
      sandlanders
      Participant

        It’s our “Tour de Adams County Challenge”. GC44REQ It’s lonely because not many take the time to find caches in all parts of Adams County. The final isn’t hard to get to, and the 19 qualifying caches can all be P&Gs if one so chooses. We do check that those claiming smileys have met the challenge.

        #2048628

        Could be on the list for a while then.

        Disclaimer : Always answering to a higher power.

        #2048642
        sandlanders
        Participant

          Not to name names, but this was a log note posted soon after publication of the challenge over three years ago:
          “Five more to go… maybe some April Showers for Adams county” That cacher still hasn’t claimed the challenge…

          😈 😈 😈 😈 😈 😉

          #2048645

          somebody is severely slacking in the Adams county caching realm.

          Disclaimer : Always answering to a higher power.

          #2048646
          BeccaDay
          Participant

            There’s also the Confluence challenge in Eau Claire.  I believe that’s what Linda is talking about.

            Oh the woes of the short geocacher!

            #2048654
            sandlanders
            Participant

              I do not see a post by Linda in this thread. I responded the way I did because Lois had visited our challenge cache yesterday and posted this query. I knew she was talking about our challenge hide.

              #2048660
              BeccaDay
              Participant

                I do not see a post by Linda in this thread. I responded the way I did because Lois had visited our challenge cache yesterday and posted this query. I knew she was talking about our challenge hide.

                Oh my goodness, that was so stupid.  I meant to say Lois and had a moment of stupidity.  My bad!  Probably because I believe that Linda has signed the log on the confluence challenge but hasn’t claimed it as found.

                Oh the woes of the short geocacher!

              Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.