Home › Forums › Regional Forums › Northeast Wisconsin › Brown County Geocache Taxation and Regulation Meeting
This topic contains 43 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by
Lostby7 17 years, 11 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
05/09/2007 at 5:03 pm #1724793
Sorry to start a new thread on this one, but it seemed to deserve a specific header.
If you have any input to provide to the parks department about their plan to impose a $5 geocache placement tax and to regulate the placement of caches within Brown Co. parks, the next meeting is tentatively scheduled for June 7th. You can get updated meeting times and schedules at http://www.co.brown.wi.us/county_board/schedule.htm.
It appears they have been inspired by Dane County on this one and it may be a done deal…
On the Left Side of the Road...05/09/2007 at 8:42 pm #1874134This is unreal…to gain what…5-600 bucks a year? If that?
05/09/2007 at 10:04 pm #1874135Here we have the parks department trying to solve a problem that doesn’t really exist. for instance, there is a cache in one of the Brown County parks that has existed since Jan. 2003, GCC1C6. It is a a great cache that has been visited more that 260 times, and has never to my knowledge caused a problem for anyone else using the park. The other two caches in that park likewise have never been anything except a fun hide/find. I believe the same thing can be said for all of the other caches in Brown County Parks. Just what do they hope to accomplish with this added paperwork?
05/10/2007 at 2:30 am #1874136I am inclined to attend this meeting, however, the attitude expressed by these pompous a$$e$ will simply make my blood boil and I fear this decision is already made.
What a shame. Apparently WI geocachers have not been able to police themselves for the last six years that geocaching has been in WI. Thank God Almighty! Brown County is stepping in to show us the way!
Frickin’ Morons.
05/10/2007 at 1:39 pm #1874137Righteous indignation on our part probably won’t amount to a hill of beans in the eyes of Brown County’s officials, but I can take the stance that I will not find caches under their jurisdiction any longer, and perhaps local cachers up there should make a point of telling us whether a cache is under their jurisdiction or not on the cache page.
The paltry sum they will collect from cache placement fees is nothing compared to the money we spend in their communities. I have family in the area, and I can attest to the fact that since we have started caching (about two years now), the two of us alone have exceeded in food and gas the $500.00 or so they will collect in fees every year.
Perhaps they’ll feel it, perhaps they won’t. We are not a large demographic yet. But maybe cities with more understanding management policies will see more of our business, and will be happy for our dollar.
05/10/2007 at 3:06 pm #1874138On the Left Side of the Road...05/10/2007 at 3:26 pm #1874139Another point to emphasize is that because there are already caches placed in Brown county parks, due to the cache density guidelines, it is unlikely that any caches will be placed in the parks in the near future, except in the case that an existing cache is archived. All in all, there is very little to be accomplished here of a positive nature.
05/10/2007 at 6:13 pm #1874140The impression I get is that they would require this for existing caches as well. If you recall the DNR did the same thing, or at least I was following some caches on Rib Mountain that were threatened w/removal if they didn’t get the right paperwork. Of course, someone from the parks dept would have to be smart enough to figure out how to hunt and find noncompliant “legacy” caches if they wanted to go that route.
On the Left Side of the Road...05/10/2007 at 10:00 pm #1874141Does anybody know how many caches are in County Parks:
Bay Shore Three or Four. So 15-20 Bucks
Fonferek Glen 1 so 5.00
WayMor Park 1 so 5.00I am sure there are more. lets actually make a list to bring to the meeting. I plan on being there…
I also spoke to a Brown County Board Member, and he said that more then likely, the fee is going to be shot down….. Which is good, but lets come up with some hardcore evidence for them…
So far we are at a whopping 30 Bucks a year according to my calculations…
And I am sure, they will have to hire a 40-50K per year employee to handle the paperwork….
Justin
05/10/2007 at 10:18 pm #1874142@k0rpl wrote:
And I am sure, they will have to hire a 40-50K per year employee to handle the paperwork….
Justin
Sounds like the perfect job for me.
05/10/2007 at 10:44 pm #1874143Um, No. I already have my Resume and Cover letter in for the Newly Created Position…
05/11/2007 at 1:07 am #1874144Pamperin park has three caches in it, looks like it might be the big money maker for Brown County, The dog park has one cache, the boat launch at Wrightstown has two caches. Barkhausen has one, and the reforestration camp has three. Looks like your workload could get out of hand k0rpl! Please consider me for your assistant.
05/11/2007 at 1:16 am #1874145O.K Frizz, you got it, but remember, we can only pay the assistant 60 to 70K..
Don’t ya love Politics….
So:
Bay Shore Three or Four. So 15-20 Bucks
Fonferek Glen 1 so 5.00
WayMor Park 1 so 5.00
Pamperin Park 3 so 15.00
Dog Park 1 so 5.00
Wrighstown Boat launch 2 so 10.00Wohoo up to 60 bucks. Big Money, big Money!!!
05/11/2007 at 1:33 am #1874146What time is this meeting? I only can see the May Calendar on their website.
Thank you to all who are putting work into gathering information to help shoot this ridiculous idea down!!
05/12/2007 at 12:07 pm #1874147Updated Info:
So:
Bay Shore Three or Four. So 15-20 Bucks
Fonferek Glen 1 so 5.00
WayMor Park 1 so 5.00
Pamperin Park 3 so 15.00
Dog Park 1 so 5.00
Wrighstown Boat launch 2 so 10.00
Barkhausen 1 so 5.00
Reforestration Camp 3 so 15.00Oh, Oh, Oh, Could we be reaching 80.00 Bucks. I think we may..
Next question is how many of these would remain if the 5.00 fee went into effect??
Justin
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.