cache rescue or not?

This topic contains 19 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by  Northwoods Tom 14 years ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1953745

    sandlanders
    Participant


    @codejunkie wrote:

    I think in this case a “Verify Present” would be more appropriate for the “Cache Rescue” type. The finder would get the points for the cache rescue, but the container would stay in place after it’s found (or be moved slightly to get it back in play).

    That’s what I was thinking of doing if I submitted a cache rescue. If I had found it myself the other day, I was going to place the container somewhere else and redo the cache page. If I archived it, it was either let it be, or someone else could find it and do what they wanted with it. Right now the cache is in limbo while we mull over things.

    #1953746

    sandlanders
    Participant


    Without the incentive of any cache rescue points and without any request on our part, jar42 took it upon himself to see if he could find this cache that he had previously found. And he did! And after only ten minutes or so of searching!

    He moved the container to a better spot, sent us the coords and a description of the new hide, and after checking things out ourselves in the near future (a FTF on our own cache! 😉 ), we will be getting the cache up and running again.

    Now there’s a good caching friend, and one who enjoys the game enough to help others when help is needed. Thanks, Jim! So nice to have you in our caching neighborhood! 😀

    #1953747

    CodeJunkie
    Participant


    That’s cool and worthy of some praise.

    #1953748

    BeccaDay
    Participant


    Well done jar42!

    Not all who wander are lost. -J.R.R. Tolkien

    #1953749

    Northwoods Tom
    Participant


    Good news! Glad it happened.

Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Purveyors of Fine Tupperware