› Forums › Geocaching in Wisconsin › General › Gaming the system
- This topic has 38 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
beezers958.
-
AuthorPosts
-
04/17/2012 at 1:38 pm #1733121
I seem to have run into a mini-epidemic of people intentionally violating the guidelines by placing traditional caches which are not at the listed coordinates. Please note that I am NOT referring to people who do a poor job of measuring their coordinates or accidentally enter the coordinates incorrectly. I am referring to intentional dishonesty. In some cases, people are doing this to place their cache without getting a required permit or permission from a landowner. In other cases, people have done this to place a cache very close to airports, schools, or some other restricted areas. Some people have done this to get around proximity violations, while some others do it just because they think it is funny to give people bad coordinates. This sort of behavior is not acceptable and is considered a violation of the Terms of Use of the geocaching.com website. I would have hoped that people would conduct themselves in geocaching as they would in the rest of their life, that is with honesty and integrity.
If you have not read the guidelines, please take time to read them before you submit your cache. If you are unsure about how a certain guideline would apply to your cache, please contact Becky or myself to get clarification.
04/17/2012 at 11:29 pm #1959497Very well said!
04/18/2012 at 10:20 pm #1959498agree-very well said Where is the like button!!
04/18/2012 at 11:41 pm #1959499I am still rather naive I guess. Silly me, the rules say “do this” and I follow them. I didn’t know there was an option to do otherwise
Following the signals from space.
04/18/2012 at 11:43 pm #1959500WA, our illustrious webmaster has given us a shorter way to say that here: colon, like (small letters), colon
… as in :like:
04/18/2012 at 11:45 pm #1959501yeah and I goofed it up doing it the hard way too… *sigh*
Following the signals from space.
04/18/2012 at 11:46 pm #1959502@Walkingadventure wrote:
I am still rather naive I guess. Silly me, the rules say “do this” and I follow them. I didn’t know there was an option to do otherwise
:like:
04/18/2012 at 11:46 pm #1959503:like:
:like:oh I get it
Following the signals from space.
04/18/2012 at 11:47 pm #1959504:like:
04/19/2012 at 12:48 am #1959505Thread Stealers is leaking again. I’ll look into it.
04/19/2012 at 12:52 am #1959506@Team Black-Cat wrote:
Thread Stealers is leaking again. I’ll look into it.
:like:
04/19/2012 at 12:59 am #1959507Hypothetically……if one were to stumble across a published geocache, and believe it to be in some sort of violation, should that ‘one’ report such potential violation? And if so, how and to whom? Hypothetically, of course.
(“creak” goes Pandora’s box)
04/19/2012 at 1:16 am #1959508This is why all my caches are listed as puzzles, then I can do whatever I want as long as there is some convoluted hippie logic 8) but seriously at least my coords are legit.
Can we have a blacklist (j/k, kind of) so I can just ignore all of their caches, I know there is a particular IL team that all their hides went on the ignore list.
04/19/2012 at 1:45 am #1959509@huffinpuffin2 wrote:
Hypothetically……if one were to stumble across a published geocache, and believe it to be in some sort of violation, should that ‘one’ report such potential violation? And if so, how and to whom? Hypothetically, of course.
(“creak” goes Pandora’s box)
I have actually run into such a case … a multi-cache published as a traditional so that the CO could avoid filing a DNR notification form. I reported it to a reviewer (WisKid) and he archived the cache and asked me to remove the containers.
All opinions, comments, and useless drivel I post are mine alone and do not reflect the opinions of the WGA BOD.
04/19/2012 at 3:18 am #1959510@BigJim60 wrote:
@huffinpuffin2 wrote:
Hypothetically……if one were to stumble across a published geocache, and believe it to be in some sort of violation, should that ‘one’ report such potential violation? And if so, how and to whom? Hypothetically, of course.
(“creak” goes Pandora’s box)
I have actually run into such a case … a multi-cache published as a traditional so that the CO could avoid filing a DNR notification form. I reported it to a reviewer (WisKid) and he archived the cache and asked me to remove the containers.
’cause the DNR form is soooo difficult to file…
Disclaimer : Always answering to a higher power.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.