This topic contains 20 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
Could you imagine the outrage people would have if the local bomb squad was called and they destroyed the Medallion? They could use the same justification: Something in a tree that had a 1% chance of being something other than a Medallion. And since there isn’t a web site clearly listing the whereabouts of said Medallion, it should actually be a greater risk of getting destroyed.
Of course, I speak tongue in cheek as I perfectly realize I am way out in left field on this. Just something to make people think, especially when the shoe is on the other foot.
(how many Cliché’s can someone use in one paragraph? 😉 )
especially if said medallion is in a non-labeled container…
while the medallion goes unfound, geocachers in brown county have a new excuse to give to muggles when asked what you are looking for as you circle and stare at pine trees in the parks.
“why I’m lookin’ for packer medallions of course!”
@-cheeto- wrote:
while the medallion goes unfound, geocachers in brown county have a new excuse to give to muggles when asked what you are looking for as you circle and stare at pine trees in the parks.
“why I’m lookin’ for packer medallions of course!”
Heck, you can use this excuse even after it’s found. Just say you’re looking for the NEW contest! You heard it was on a bridge, near an airport, or in a wayside somewhere. 😈
On the Left Side of the Road...I also wouldn’t be surprised if they haven’t put it out yet! It was designed to run as a 10-day contest so why would they chance it being found on one of the first few days?
You know those times you go back on a DNF and find a cache where you swear you looked before and someone must have obviously taken it and put it back?
On the Left Side of the Road...@gotta run wrote:
You know those times you go back on a DNF and find a cache where you swear you looked before and someone must have obviously taken it and put it back?
Yeah, I have experienced that a couple times… But I won’t name names!
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.