@Mister Greenthumb wrote:
@Team Deejay wrote:
@Mister Greenthumb wrote:
@Team Deejay wrote:
If you don’t validate your account, you can’t place or log caches (today). The “inactive” designation is given when a person requests for their account to be deactivated. What has come out recently is that some of the lackeys didn’t know they were supposed to tell these folks that deactivating their account would also deactivate their caches.
I had thought that this status occurred when emails “bounced”, but I have been assured that this is not the case.
Note that some of the “Not Validated” members are old timers who joined prior to validation and then never responded to the validation email.
This partially makes sense, but why would someone place caches and less than 2 months later want to be inactive. Shouldn’t groundspeak archive rather than disable the caches?
Long ago, I stopped trying to figure out why people do the nonsense that they do. I believe they don’t archive them right away to give the person a chance to change their mind. These caches are still subject to being archived for being disabled too long.
And I thought besides the great pay, that being a reviewer was all fun and games.
And I thought they were all knowing and all seeing.
I’m so disappointed.
.
