This topic contains 39 replies, has 21 voices, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
Another good reason to always post your dnf’s, someone in your area may post a cache like this someday.
This one beat it by several months:
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=f17664a4-88aa-40f3-bb0b-f40eb2afcfba
On the Left Side of the Road...I like the Michigan one better, since you can not log a find on the cache UNLESS you have 100 DNFs to your name.
Hmmmmm…… maybe
@marc_54140 wrote:
I like the Michigan one better, since you can not log a find on the cache UNLESS you have 100 DNFs to your name.
Hmmmmm…… maybe
I do as well…and was thinking the same thing…there is always room for one more puzzle cache….
Well that’s really just a difference of degree, ain’t it? I suppose Peach can’t enforce the requirement for his cache, technically speaking, since it is a traditional.
On the Left Side of the Road...@gotta run wrote:
Well that’s really just a difference of degree, ain’t it? I suppose Peach can’t enforce the requirement for his cache, technically speaking, since it is a traditional.
No.
Peach’s is a bonus cache, with only 50 DNF’s required.
The MI is a mandatory 100 DNFs before you can even claim a find!
Big difference. I could claim Peach’s bonus, but did not, because I do not want a lot of multi logs showing on my stats. Getting picky lately ….
Even the “King” himself has one of these in the Twin Cities area, and he does require 100 DNFs to log the find. Probably our next trip to see Mom and Dad, as it’s not far from their place!
@marc_54140 wrote:
I could claim Peach’s bonus, but did not, because I do not want a lot of multi logs showing on my stats. Getting picky lately ….
Becoming a gc purist? Does this mean you will be signing all logs and, if so, what will become of the fabled Marc Method??? 8)
On the Left Side of the Road...@gotta run wrote:
@marc_54140 wrote:
I could claim Peach’s bonus, but did not, because I do not want a lot of multi logs showing on my stats. Getting picky lately ….
Becoming a gc purist? Does this mean you will be signing all logs and, if so, what will become of the fabled Marc Method??? 8)
Maybe ….. wait! define ‘purist’ ………… 😉
My ‘secretary’ does that for me …. 😆
My method still works fine……………. 8)@gotta run wrote:
This one beat it by several months:
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=f17664a4-88aa-40f3-bb0b-f40eb2afcfba
I didn’t see that one before. I have been spending so much time on all your puzzles that I haven’t even had time to look at any of your traditionals! (I am not complaining, keep the puzzles coming, I love em, now I just have to figure them out!)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.