This topic contains 20 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
No, it just caught Jeremy’s interest. From Facebook:
Jeremy Irish: It was initially denied and it went through the appeals process and was published… by me.
We intentionally make them guidelines because occasionally something comes along that defies definition under the current guidelines, so we can adapt.
I suspect the cache owner is cleaning up some of the negative comments, needs archived logs and obviously bogus finds.
A geocacher will be heading there in the next few months, so this won’t go unfound for too much longer.
Incidentally, the “future finder” has agreed to replace the travel bug tag with a logbook (the “bin” will count as the container), taking care of a few of the guidelines issues. I believe the GPS usage one will just have to be waived.
so it should kinda be like a letterbox.
An update from Jeremy Irish today:
http://www.locuslingua.com/geocaching-in-space
Interesting about the guidelines update 😉
Heh heh. Actually you could argue it met the guidelines from the outset because if you get there you are on a satellite!
On the Left Side of the Road...If one can blow up and enhance a little bit, it looks like the TB number can be had, off of the photo. That would be interesting to see some of our members “discover” the TB. I’m sure someone in here is savvy enough to do that.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.