This topic contains 7 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
Maybe we should remove the link for INATN from the quick links section on the left?
@glorkar wrote:
Maybe we should remove the link for INATN from the quick links section on the left?
Good point. But ya know the old saying, “It has to be discussed in a committee”? How true how true. 😆
We’re discussing it, then we’ll vote on it, then discuss it a bit more before making any changes to the plan. Then we’ll submit it in triplicate to the board. Upon their approval, we’ll vote on when it should be done. Hopefully this time next year I’ll be able to say we might get er’ done. 😆 😆 😆
All kidding aside, just yesterday zuma had asked the web-site committee to have it removed.
Dunno why I’m so sarcastic today, but I like it. 😀
@tyedyeskyguy wrote:
Dunno why I’m so sarcastic today, but I like it. 😀
Welcome to the club we have jackets and a hat on order for you, pathtags are up for discussion though.
@rsplash40 wrote:
@tyedyeskyguy wrote:
Dunno why I’m so sarcastic today, but I like it. 😀
Welcome to the club we have jackets and a hat on order for you, pathtags are up for discussion though.
LOL! 😆
@rsplash40 wrote:
@tyedyeskyguy wrote:
Dunno why I’m so sarcastic today, but I like it. 😀
Welcome to the club we have jackets and a hat on order for you, pathtags are up for discussion though.
We had a secret vote yesterday. No pathtags for you.
@-cheeto- wrote:
@rsplash40 wrote:
@tyedyeskyguy wrote:
Dunno why I’m so sarcastic today, but I like it. 😀
Welcome to the club we have jackets and a hat on order for you, pathtags are up for discussion though.
We had a secret vote yesterday. No pathtags for you.
Wait wait wait, if you just talked about it yesterday, how can you have a decision already??
Right now, the only one who can change or delete links is Jeremy, so there isn’t much the committee can do except PM JV and let him know.
So… let’s discuss that. 😛
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.