Here’s the dilemma. Say you are a co-owner of a cool cache that you were asked to be part of putting together and you know what it is and where it is.
If you log it, you look silly and logging the find makes you feel a bit like you are cheating, at least that’s how some will see it if they are particular about numbers.
If you ignore it with the Ignore It function, then you can’t put it on you watch list to see the logs which you don’t get to automatically see since you are not the official owner of the cache.
I think most cache co-owners want to read the logs and get notifications when a cache they co-own is found. That’s the point of co-owning a cache.
You only have 2 options in this case. Live with your co-owned caches coming up on your search queries by not logging them as found. Or. logging them as a Found It, even though you may have been the one that actually placed it!
It seems to me that there needs to be some additional feature that would allow co-owners to ignore listings yet monitor them. Sounds complicated.
.
