› Forums › Geocaching in Wisconsin › General › Same tree
- This topic has 13 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by
Coastiegirl04.
-
AuthorPosts
-
10/11/2007 at 1:31 am #1725565
For the 4th time, I found a cache placed in the exact same tree as a previous cache, since archived. The first time I ran across this, I thought it was odd, but there must be some kinda tree magnetism that draws us to the same trees to place caches.
BTW, 3 of 4 of the first hides were Bobcat hides originally. I guess folks in these parts like to copy Bobcat.
Just wondering if other folks have seen this elsewhere—I dont mean the same park–I mean the same exact tree.
z
10/11/2007 at 2:48 am #1879981I remember the sweet head Mistress of Team Roaming Pack describing a similar caching experience to me, and if I remember correctly, it was directly related to Zuma. She was out placing a B-Day cache in one end of a log and on the other end was a Zuma cache. 😀
10/11/2007 at 3:47 pm #1879982Anonymous
10/11/2007 at 10:01 pm #1879983Who are you and what have you done with Dave? More importantly, how do I find that %%$#@# cache?
10/11/2007 at 11:48 pm #1879984Anonymous
@rogheff wrote:
Who are you and what have you done with Dave? More importantly, how do I find that %%$#@# cache?
i am ±, and Dave is just fine as far as i know. please do watch your mouth sir, the scouts may be browsing. 🙂
i checked on the cache and found it lying in the brush near the ground. either m. nature let go, or all the searching knocked it down. i’ve found a new spot for it, in the same location. please check back to the cache page for a spoiler hint update.
💡
10/12/2007 at 1:47 am #1879985You misunderstand me. %%$#@# means “lovely”, if I had written
%$%@#@ , well now THAT would mean…well, nasty things.10/12/2007 at 2:24 am #1879986Funny you should mentioned that, its happened a few times around the valley too. I wound up right back at the same bridge or tree 2-3 times.
10/12/2007 at 2:48 am #1879987@RSplash40 wrote:
Funny you should mentioned that, its happened a few times around the valley too. I wound up right back at the same bridge or tree 2-3 times.
That’s all well and fine… but did you find the cache????
😆 Fun to pick on Rsplash the “new” guy around here.
10/12/2007 at 3:31 pm #1879988Anonymous
@rogheff wrote:
You misunderstand me. %%$#@# means “lovely”, if I had written
%$%@#@ , well now THAT would mean…well, nasty things.careful. anything you say can, and will be used against you in a cache of mystery.
💡
10/12/2007 at 4:53 pm #1879989I suspected that may be the case, so you can quote me on this,
“I hereby announce that I, Rogheff, have absolutely nothing to do with the idea, design or placement of the cache for which you are presently hunting. If you can’t find it, don’t like it, if it needs maintenance or is placed in a bad way – don’t blame me. Unless of course, it’s a fantastic cache, then I’ll take all the credit.”
10/13/2007 at 1:49 pm #1879990@Mathman wrote:
@RSplash40 wrote:
Funny you should mentioned that, its happened a few times around the valley too. I wound up right back at the same bridge or tree 2-3 times.
That’s all well and fine… but did you find the cache????
😆 Fun to pick on Rsplash the “new” guy around here.
Sheesh, try and pay the guy a compliment by doing his cache as a milestone and this is what I get in return?
👿
10/13/2007 at 2:25 pm #1879991You know splash, i see this too.. but mostly with the puzzel caches in the area, of the fox valley
10/13/2007 at 2:40 pm #1879992@Coastiegirl04 wrote:
You know splash, i see this too.. but mostly with the puzzel caches in the area, of the fox valley
This does make them much easier to solve if you watch the archives and the newly published
10/13/2007 at 2:57 pm #1879993thats very true.. it does make it easier that way..
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.