-
Just a quick note to let all of you puzzle players know that I have removed all the other “challenge” marquees from any of my previously defined ALR caches. I expect is wasn’t a limiting factor for any of you but if indeed you gave it any consideration, now you don’t need to.
All of my puzzle caches with additional logging requests are meant to inform, entertain or challenge you and I consider anybody who decides to ignore the additional task request to be of a certain grab-and-go group. This type of caching isn’t my style and in most cases defeats the purpose of the cache in the first place. But, I do know and appreciate that people cache for different reasons.
Suffice it to say that if you come across any additional logging requests, formerly ALR’s or not (on mime or anyone else’s caches), you should consider the intent of the cache and the effort the owner put into it before deciding to skip it and move on. Enough said, now get solving!
@seldom|seen wrote:
Suffice it to say that if you come across any additional logging requests, formerly ALR’s or not (on mine or anyone else’s caches), you should consider the intent of the cache and the effort the owner put into it . . .
This should be the case for ANY cache, not just ALRs, puzzles, etc. At least make the attempt to do the cache as the cache owner intended it to be found–no shortcuts just for the numbers. That’s what makes caching fun for us, but to each his/her own.
But it’s going to be a while before we find 100 s|s caches . . . 😉
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Purveyors of Fine Tupperware