[abron132]

I’ve found the one in Waupaca and with some extra looking in the snow you should be able to find it. It was a bit tricky at first, but found what we thought was WP1 which lead us to the final. I looked and there was a DNF as the last post but I’m sure its still there.

[abron132]

I have 7 dnf’s for 131 finds and I log a DNF even if I didn’t spend a super long time looking for it. I DNF caches because I didn’t find them, and so that I have a reference for next time. Plus as a cache owner it would be nice to see DNF to make me feel like maybe I did have a good hide 😆
I’m just personally troubled by someone posting a find even if they looked previously and DNF’d it but didn’t log that. (Guess that’s why we all have an opinion)

I have also noticed that some people sign logs but they don’t log them online, why wouldn’t you??

[abron132]

@JimandLinda wrote:

I still like the idea of ‘sentinel’ caches. You must have (x) number of DNFs on your profile to log the cache as Found. But that is an ALR and not approved by GC.

Any options on that line of thought?

I’m not sure what you mean by ‘sentinel’ cache or what ALR stands for, could you fill me in? Personally I would have logged it as a DNF first and then as a Find. I was just wondering because I had a cachers post on one of my newly placed caches a log that said “I was here last night but DNF. Went back today at 12:50 and found it STF still no FTF. Great hide. TFTC – SL”

But never posted a DNF first.

[abron132]

So when do we find out the results??

[abron132]

We just moved to town have started working on putting out some new caches in Waupaca. We have about a half dozen containers just haven’t found the prime real estate to place them.

[abron132]

Thanks for all the help. That’s the one I was looking for! We wanted to make this #100 but we wanted to get out and cache. We will be going to this one very soon though. Thanks again!!! 😀 😀 😀

[Author]

Posts