I have read this topic with interest. I can see both sides of it, pros and cons. I guess one thing that makes sense to me in favor of three year term is the simple math of it for elections. Once established, however that is done, it would be easy to follow. I think of the years where there were a lot of candidates and fewer seats open; and the opposite too. Did those who weren’t elected, often by small margins, run again when the field of candidates was smaller and/or there was another open seat? Everyone’s life circumstances change from year to year. I think midterm elections for those spots that open up due to someone having to leave BOD, or perhaps having alternate/runner up take over, would be options. I like hearing the perspectives of past BOD members. That helps frame the debate well. Thanks for opening up the discussion!
