Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 270 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Packer debacle! #1916647

    @furfool wrote:

    I think McCarthy’s head is getting closer the chopping block.

    One can only hope! We’ve had it with him and his empty promises to address the problems, not to mention his extreme overuse of the word,”FOOTBALL”! We all know the definition of crazy: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. 😡

    in reply to: Lake Geneva Must Do Caches??? #1916352

    The Amazing Geo-Race series makes for a great trip around the lake area. Definitely recommended!

    in reply to: . #1916409

    @Team Black-Cat wrote:

    If we’re beating dead horses, I still want to see roundabouts banned. Not the caches… just the roundabouts.

    Captain’s with you on this, but Mate still likes ’em. (The roundabaouts, not the caches.)

    in reply to: WGA webpage size #1915970

    @Miata wrote:

    I think that only effected the pages of that one thread where the pictures were posted.

    That’s been the case for us, too.

    in reply to: Finding the last cache in your area…. #1915878

    We have most of the caches within 15 miles or so, which has required us to drive further and further, but it’s gotten us to a lot of neat places, too. We still have a lot to find in Kenosha and Racine, which aren’t that far away. At one time, we were hell-bent to get every cache in Bong. That’s a great place, but there haven’t been any new caches there in a while, so we really miss caching there. Overall, it’s a bit of a bummer to have to travel more, but there’s a whole world of caches out there and the fun is never-ending! 😀

    Whew! Never realized so many cachers were packing heat! 🙂 Anyway, we always go with the Leatherman.

    in reply to: Full Logs and Replacing #1915573

    @Team Deejay wrote:

    I think the real answer is that you should only place the number of caches that you are able to maintain well.

    We’ll give a big “Amen” to that!

    @gotta run wrote:

    On that same line of thinking, Sweetlife, what about randomly posting pictures from the photo albums to show how fun this is?

    I agree that having a page that is 90% blank does nothing for the association.

    Photos of people caching are the first thing you see on the Geocaching.com home page. We agree that adding a similar feature to this site would be a good idea.

    in reply to: New Battleship series #1915227

    @sandlanders wrote:

    So, has anyone completed all 106 caches yet? This series is already on its second day now. 😉

    Place your bets, folks. Who will it be?

    in reply to: Should GC.com have a competitor? #1915042

    Navicache.com is out there too, but has far fewer caches. We’ve dabbled with it but haven’t actually looked for any caches on the site. We’re pretty happy with Geocaching.com and aren’t looking to go elsewhere.

    in reply to: What’s the Deal with your User Name? #1914742

    Captain comes from 35 years of driving excursion boats around Geneva Lake as a summer job. Now that I’m retired from education, it’s become a primary job. Mate, of course, is a loving wife, former colleague in the teaching profession(also now retired), avid caching partner, and even a former crew member on the boats.

    in reply to: WSQ thanks …. #1914565

    That was easy to fix. We edited ours today. We never would have known about the puctuation problem without Marc calling it to our attention.

    in reply to: Bike trail caching #1914553

    Hey, many thanks for all these great suggestions! This will definitely give us some new spots to try. 😀

    Mate loves roundabouts-Captain hates them, but we agree that they’re no place for a cache.

    in reply to: Google Docs: HTML creation made easy #1913602

    Now that’s pretty cool. Thanks for a very useful post!

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 270 total)