Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
congrats zuma!
i kinda like the current logo…
in fact, I cast my vote to keep it as is at the end of all of this mess. I really liked some of the early submissions but when they were eliminated I began to like the current logo more and more…
What if the focus shifted to revamping the current logo but keeping the essence of what it is now? Get 4 or 5 options of updates to the current logo and pit it up against the same old logo in a final round bout? It’s obvious based on PC Frogs observation of the stats that the majority would be in favor of this approach.
Further, the “winning logo” doesn’t differ all that much from the current (in terms of how it represents the group) so why change to that one if there’s issues with it being a “copy cat”. It seems that problem goes away if we just give the current logo the modernization it deserves and move on.
Enjoy the Geo-vacation Alex. See you on “the other side”…
That would be “lame”
I don’t claim to be anything on the contrary… this coming from someone with my nickname. 😛
If you think 2 is lame, you really don’t want to know what I was thinking at the time… 😈
-cheeto-
09/18/2008 at 11:54 am in reply to: Sparse Grey Hackle & The Blondie Bloodhound Join The Clu #1896088congrats!
i like the old black and white photo one. that’s funny…
Quote:Cache replacements when the original is still out there.What’s embarrassing is when the cache owner does this themselves…. doh! I speak from experience…
I had 2 containers at one of mine and it took nearly a year before a cacher acknowledged both containers and removed one as indicated in s|s’s post on the subject (without my consent as the owner)
In this example, it kinda became an experiment. I wanted to see how many cacher’s would find more than one container when hunting a cache. Would they log both?
I had mixed emotions about the cacher removing one of the containers which is sorta what gotta run is referring to with the not assuming what the owner wants. What if an owner really does want 2 containers to be hidden? 🙂
Whether were talking about replacing, removing, etc. you should not assume what the owner wants. With proper communication with the owner, go ahead and replace, remove, revamp, adopt, etc.
-cheeto-
I’ve kinda become a deliquent owner recently and most of the time just archive them when they go missing. Having my caches replaced for me to keep them going is a godsend during a busy time in my life. But I know you’re talking about owners that leave the game….
As for those cache owners who left the game with caches out in the wild, without handing them over to someone or archiving. Well, they’re just litterers as far as I’m concerned.
I agree, if the owner is not in the game anymore, the LGC players should be removing these old, broken, moldy wet containers and posting needs archiving and they should get bonus points for this rather than replacing the container for someone who did not have the respect for the game and our environment to either hand it over to a new owner or pull it from the field.
If they are revisiting a lonely they’ve found before with tons of dnf’s and it’s not where they found it and the owner is clearly done with geocaching, they should get a bonus for posting a needs archived with legit information rather than bonus points for putting in a new container and (as the poster states) perpetuating the situation.
So I guess I’m saying I agree… doesn’t happen often! 🙂
-cheeto-
Considering the event page does not state this is not allowed, it would be difficult for the WGA to enforce such a rule for the picnic event, no?
-cheeto-
oh look, walmart had more tape
can’t cache anyway. weather is crappy.
You asking for more caches there?
along those lines….
I think there’s room for another
I can squeeze one more in.
people who don’t take the time to fully read the cache page…
people don’t read the cache pages?
okay okay, done playing 😈 ‘s advocate
Can’t afford gas. Will Stay home.
Yes, listings go there first, but there is a lot of owner cleanup that occurs after the adoption is made
you mean cache owners change their listings after they are approved and published? say it ain’t so!
Also, can someone correct the name of the Earthcache Discussion Forum section to correctly read “EarthCache Discussion”. Thanks (had to do it…)
-
AuthorPosts