@Johnny Cache wrote:
@furfool wrote:
I don’t mind at all having 2 QBs, Ks and Ds. In fact I ended up doing that last year with my QB problems and to get around the bye weeks. I think if it’s set up like last year, everyone would be free to do what they want. If not, anyone not liking it, will just have to deal with it.
Fury – It’s always wise to keep 2 QB’s, K’s and Defense. The difference this year is that you start all 6 of them. If one of you QB’s is on a bye week, you’ll have to bench him and pick up a 3rd QB. This is a big difference from last year. Last year we had 9 starters (QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, Flex, TE, K, Def). This year Cheesy is looking at 13 starters and 3 bench (QB, QB, RB, RB, RB, WR, WR, Flex, TE, K, K, Def, Def).
Just think, if you have 4 guys on a bye week, you can only pick up 3 guys to fill their shoes. One of your bye players will have to start. Could you image when Mouthman’s team, which usually consists of 7-8 Packers goes on their bye week. He might as well chalk that one up as a loss.
This type of setup will be a first for me, but sure ought to be interesting. It’ll be interesting to see how things play out.
Oops! I misunderstood. In that case, I have to agree with Johnny and Mouth. Thanks Johnny.
