[gkrone]

@-cheeto- wrote:

They might have meant 500 “oldest” as in haven’t been found in the longest amount of time. Not oldest as in placed the earliest. A better word could be “lonliest”

At least that is how I interpreted the comment…

This would qualify a cache as being “lonely” and allow you to keep the returned list to 500 or whatever specific number you choose.

That’s right, I meant the 500 loneliest caches. If a cache has been lonely for longer than the time frame looked at will it be in the list?

[gkrone]

Is there any way to just grab the oldest 500 regardless of how long they have been lonely?

[gkrone]

@Trudy & the beast wrote:

We have been harnessing “wasted” energy to power self-winding watches for over 50 years now, and they don’t weigh 3+ pounds. Thanks for the info. Tje gizmo is certainly interesting, anyway.

If they can get the weight of these down, we could strap a couple dozen onto a 10-year old and generate enough power to light a small home. 😆

or city

[Author]

Posts