Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Appleton…..no camping for me this time but I’ll stop out for a few (caches that is).
So the contest they are about to launch got me thinking and….. GC11PT3.
Same here…I have some HTML knowledge but only enough to get me in trouble….I do post a lot though and have LOTS of opinions if that counts…
@jenhen1 wrote:
….I would think that for the sake of making it as user friendly for the general public who are new to geocaching…. the whole book would make Alot of sense, and for those who are used to going paperless, the GSAK option would be pretty cool!
Count me among those who are clueless about GSAK. Dumb it down as much as possible so that even people like me can figure it out.
@Nokyza wrote:
We live in the Chippewa FallsEau Claire area, but travel Wisconsin extensively on the weekends.
WooHoo! You live in a hotbed of Geocaching activity! Be sure to attend the Chippewa Falls event beginning this April 14th.
Welcome to the frey!OK here’s my (one sided) submission. Please delete my last picture.

Please forgive the crudeness as I’m not a graphic artist. This is my vision for the front. The back would contain the reverse image of the state (if it doesn’t look to odd) and specific information like WGA Camp-out and the date etc…I will work on that part later as I’m fairly tired and in need of sleep.
~~ Picture Deleted ~~
well I guess that takes care of that…. 😥
@Buy_The_Tie wrote:
The DNR form a notification form, not a form requiring approval.
It should be submitted to the DNR prior to submitting the cache page to geocaching.com.
Which is my point….not to cause waves but as it is a notification and not a permissionary document, can’t it be submitted after the cache is approved….or after the approver gives the all clear but before the cache is activated?
Bump the parks fee up a buck and lump the trails money into the parks fees budget. I hate paying two fees for what I consider to be the same thing.
@Team Hemisphere Dancer wrote:
It will need to be in before the cache is approved.
…and if it doesn’t get approved it is a waste of the DNRs time and will result in the filing of a cache that does not exist…..
If they ever get made…..
@PCFrog wrote:
I not sure I know enough to make a educated vote. The trails that I have seen only require the pass for those who are doing activities such as horseback riding, ATV, Bicycle, Cross country skiing to just name a few. I have yet to come across one that had a fee just for normal walking. How many and where are these trails that require a fee for those walking?
Yep same here which is why I haven’t voted on this…I know of only trails which to bike on you must pay a yearly fee (which I’m against).
@LightningBugs Mum wrote:
…If more incidents like this cause them to start feeling like having geocaches is more trouble than it is worth – we would find ourselves dealing with some serious issues down the road.
I’m just sayin’….
Nah there are plenty of virgin guard rails yet…..and all those light pole covers..that alone could keep us going until the year 2010.
@Auntienae wrote:
– I thought the base memory in the 76 was twice the size of the 60.
AuntieNaeMemory really shouldn’t be the sellig point though, as if there is an expandable card for the unit it costs next to nothing to get a 1gig microSD card.
-
AuthorPosts