[marc_54140]

@Team Hemisphere Dancer wrote:

@marc_54140 wrote:

But ……….

EACH member of a Team gets to vote. Husband and wife? Each needs to have a separate registration with the WGA, and then each can vote.

Does Sheila have and account?

Hmmm…. Never thought of that! How about MacKenzie as well?

Remember, vote early and vote often!

[marc_54140]

I place caches to be found. How they are found does not concern me.

If you really want each finder to solve your puzzles, then you need to add a requirement to the cache page that asks for a sworn, notarized statement that the logger did solve the puzzle. (Lots of sarcasm here. I will notarize anyone’s statement ……..!)

It really is All About the Numbers man! I want to clear them off my radar screen.

[marc_54140]

It’s all the way you play the game ……..

There are some puzzles I can solve on my own. Some I need some help with. And others I can not figure out at all.

I have no problem asking for help when I need it. I will continue this behavior.

Ultimately, each cacher has to decide for him or herself if finding the cache or solving the puzzle, or both, is what he or she feels is necessary when logging a find. For me, a find is a find. And that is, after all, the standard definition of finding a cache – find the container.

If a cache owner wants to be picky, and stick in some meaningless requirements, go ahead.

Alex, you specifically, need to lighten up. That’s MY opinion.

You have some great hides, containers, etc. Do you not want a lot of cachers to find them, and enjoy them? Since most of your best hides are puzzles, a vast percentage of cachers will never solve them. Even veteran puzzle solvers can be stumped by the twisted logic you use in them.

I guess I’ll take a look at my Ignore List again ……

😥

[marc_54140]

OK, find a meeting room, and pick a date. We will work something out.

[marc_54140]

But ……….

EACH member of a Team gets to vote. Husband and wife? Each needs to have a separate registration with the WGA, and then each can vote.

[marc_54140]

Definitely a great event!

[marc_54140]

P U Z Z L E S ! ! ! !

[marc_54140]

@cheezehead wrote:

@Lostby7 wrote:

Rather than try and come up with some whole new card…perhaps ask the facility to grant a discount to those holding a WGA ID tag. Most of us who have visited WGA sanctioned events now own one.

Well, I don’t know too many up this way that have WGA ID tags and I don’t think there were any at the picnic last summer. Other than Bnb that is.

Well then, perhaps a WGA event in your area ……..

[marc_54140]

Congratulations, Pete! Still a great Milestone despite all the members ………

[marc_54140]

Whatever format, the obvious things is have them listed by city name.

Need to have the flxibility to add and remove places.

[marc_54140]

Now I really like that idea!

Can we have a ‘great desserts’ section as well?

[marc_54140]

@K0rpl wrote:

Oh Come on Now Marc. I wouldn’t go that far! You Normal?

Yes, when compared to the likes of YOU !

[marc_54140]

Carol for PaprDolls – estimate 45-60 minutes.

[marc_54140]

I have cruised the Pacific a number of times. Got sea sick a lot!

Also get air sick!

Hmmm…… Maybe.

[marc_54140]

If it were not for geocaching, I’d be normal ………

[Author]

Posts