Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Great choice for a milestone. Congratulations!
Congratulations on a big number!
@Lostby7 wrote:
I would request that if there will be water caches either as the part of the main 50 or as additional (bonus) caches that there be some kind of advance notice here or on the cache page…particularly if swimwear or a boat will be required to attempt them.
I am one of the persons who will be hiding water caches and the plan right now is to hide them by boat and they will only be accessible by boat. This means that they will all be 5 terrain. We plan on hiding them so there will be no way to get to them by land.
Congratulations on joining a select group of cachers.
Congratulations Rod!
@jar42 wrote:
Though I foresee this unhealthy obsession with keeping pace with someone far younger coming to a bad end, Congratulations.
Like a dirty diaper in the 1K Tribute cache to the Sandlanders.
@Lostby7 wrote:
I have lots of equipment but it’s a bit out of my caching range at 2.5 hours away. Looks like fun though. I heard that a river cache was going to be placed near me but as yet it has not materialized….granted there are always those pesky woodpeckers in Johnson Creek.
You must drive really slow. It’s 90 miles for me and you live closer. If it will make you happy I’ll try and place some canoe/kayak hides this summer. I have an idea for a series that will not be accessible by land. Three to four hides making it worth getting your watercraft out Also I’m letting the cat out of the bag, but there will be REAL water hides at the WB Event this year that will only be accessible with a canoe or kayak.
Congratulations Todd 500!
Congratulations Russ, for as long as it lasts. Also congratulations on your 3rd WGA forum post.
It’s geocaching, part of finding the cache sometimes is finding where to start on your own. I only give parking coordinates if that is definitely where I want you to start.
Congratulations Barry and Val and thanks too for all of the caches that you’ve placed.
@Cache_boppin_BunnyFuFu wrote:
Here’s to finding another couple hundred when we head to Scotland in 3.5 months and their Mega event!!!! I wonder if they will make us all wear kilts for caching!! LOL
And you know what they wear under kilts. Hope for a calm day.
@SammyClaws wrote:
The one exception to my statement above was one cacher did claim a find, then wrote me a nasty note for putting a cache so far up a tree that he didnt feel comfortable climbing (he was a noob and was quite upset about a number of things about the cache). I tried to nicely point out that the point of a level 4 terrain was to climb the tree and I did not consider it a find. He deleted his log.
We tried this cache back in December with our 13 year old granddaughter Emma and decided to wait for better conditions to make the climb. We did spot the cache way up in the tree, but posted only a note. We took Emma back last weekend and let her climb the tree for find #1000. It’s not a hard tree to climb, but the cache is way up there.
Congratulations and I’ll bet most of your finds for today were “W” for wet. This is a series that we are looking forward to doing.
I looked to see which cache it was of yours and considering the container I would delete their log. However, I would send them a message and give them a week to go back and do so. Every cache isn’t for everyone. If they are not “agile enough” to do a hide like this there are plenty more to hunt.
-
AuthorPosts
