Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
@labrat_wr wrote:
there were far more tables set up with food than vendor items to limit social interaction, yet there were no complaints, I presume, about that.
The food was part of the event. the vendors other than the WGA, were not.
Looking back on my last post, I understand food was part of the event and that was my point— there should NOT have been any complaints about anything, really, since nobody logically complained about the all food taking space and allegedly limiting or otherwise interfering with socializing. It would have been just as ridiculous.
Seriously, whatever is taking up space to be sold or eaten has no effect on socializing— only where you can put things down. As I was walking around “socializing”, I heard no complaints at all. Sour apples will always spoil a pie it seems. Mmmmm, pie!
The majority should always rule and it seems the majority supported and bought from attending vendors without complaining so, with any luck, socializing, shopping, and geocaching can now co-exist with this decision in place. Thanks to all those who worked it all out!
I sense a disturbance in the force, however… sour apples? 8)
Thinking my first reply to Wisconsin geocoin designs may be incorrectly in the announcement area, I thought I’d add it here too.
From team Black-Cat’s post, this design is awesome! I previously posted:
“Unless I’ve missed it somewhere else, I have not seen how the winning design (or when) will be chosen.
My opinion is that submission 2 from March 29th is an awesome design that illustrates all the counties in Wisconsin to geocache in with recreational activities on the back – and is a real collectable type design. I couldn’t imagine a more popular coin given the way some collect them.
Also, I think the coin would be even more appealing with a band at the bottom as in Submission 3 for the WGA logo keeping the front clean with only the counties on it… but again, if designs are final & a matter of selecting one – #2 would be my pick to buy a few of.”
Just my two-cents worth if anyone was interested in feedback of any of the designs.
Unless I’ve missed it somewhere else, I have not seen how the winning design (or when) will be chosen.
My opinion is that submission 2 from March 29th is an awesome design that illustrates all the counties in Wisconsin to geocache in with recreational activities on the back – and is a real collectable type design. I couldn’t imagine a more popular coin given the way some collect them.
Also, I think the coin would be even more appealing with a band at the bottom as in Submission 3 for the WGA logo keeping the front clean with only the counties on it… but again, if designs are final & a matter of selecting one – #2 would be my pick to buy a few of. 😀
-
AuthorPosts
