Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 576 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Could be an issue… Placers be aware…. #1929348

    @Lostby7 wrote:

    Seriously why would someone put their stash in a publicly listed container…

    Uhmm would you stash you wallet in a cache for a day or two? ๐Ÿ˜•

    Sounds like people lost their ability to reason.

    in reply to: La Crosse Area 10th Anniversary Event #1927571

    Thanks for the event…

    in reply to: GSAK – Filter Logs #1927125

    Got it — thanks for looking

    in reply to: Household debate regarding stats and such #1926500

    The only time I would say stats cross the line if it is used to demean those with less or more.

    If a person is just saying, “look what I have done” then no harm or offense has been made.

    in reply to: TICKS #1926690

    @HeliDood wrote:

    I pulled 16 of them off me the other day.

    Ticks can not fly
    Ticks can not jump
    Rarely do ticks inhabit trees

    The hang out in the grass or in brush, waiting for a potential host to climb onto. Ticks don’t come to you, they wait for a host to come to them.

    [/list]

    When I take into account these know items it amazes me the density of ticks. Iรขโ‚ฌโ„ขm no statistician or the like, but when I look at a wooded area that covers several hundred acres and I only walk through a two foot wide path for usually 20-30 acres deep to how many ticks are picked up just in the entry of the woods. It boggles my mind to fathom how many ticks must really be out there for a person to randomly gather so many.

    in reply to: 2010 WGA Geocoin Ideas Development and Discussion #1924953

    @RSplash40 wrote:

    Still think each design needs a scuba diver, its a group of cachers getting absolutely no love or recognition…harumph…

    ๐Ÿ˜› Laugh everyone, its a good thing….

    The scuba diver is there he is just under the water. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: All S|S caches up for adoption. #1925795

    On a positive note…

    Your adoption or archiveal of caches will at least follow your own words.

    Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:30 am
    @seldom|seen wrote:

    caching community would benefit from a voluntary cache review and archive commitment from its members, to make space for new and/or better caches.

    @seldom|seen wrote:

    So , I propose a voluntary annual portfolio review of your cache holdings to determine if you own any cache listings that could be moved, offered up for adoption or archived to open up space for others to place new caches. I am thinking something like 5-10% of your caches. For most cachers that would translate to 1 or 2 caches. For me it is closer to 10 caches and for someone like Ecorangers… well that’s a lot.

    in reply to: Can’t find the topic #1922052

    @Lostby7 wrote:

    @marc_54140 wrote:

    Liar’s cache.

    (Gauntlet).

    I still have not forgotten about that cache. ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: New TB Rescue site #1921390

    cute

    in reply to: none #1920521

    โ“

    in reply to: Do you keep a Geocaching journal? #1920320

    Thanks for staying at our hotel and we would like to hear back from you.
    Please rate your stay.

    1. Fabulous
    2. Great
    3. Wonderful
    4. Perfect

    No – GC.com is the journal

    in reply to: Why I voted "NO" to logging temps #1887226

    ๐Ÿ˜ฏ

    I can’t believe this topic is back…

    in reply to: Hudson Hot Air Affair 2010 #1918477

    not sure about the cache events but we will be going to the hot air event.

    in reply to: just got a nuvi 500 #1918797

    This is on a IMac?

    in reply to: Computer experts, please advise. #1918463

    @TyeDyeSkyGuy wrote:

    My question is, could some one gain access to my computer when it’s on and I’m not monitoring it?

    Could someone gain access when it’s powered down?

    Yes to both…

    Unless you lock the computer in a safe or password protect the computer, anyone who sits down at the computer can use it or turn it on. ๐Ÿ˜€

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 576 total)