Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
@shrek & fiona wrote:
do I hear lawsuit
the American wayMy GPS (Lowrance)when turned on, has a disclaimer that is shown stating that you should not be using the device as your primary means of navigation.
Sorry to hear that Trekkin’ is sick again.
I would be happy to get my hands on one.
Still looks good in all positions….
Sorry had to
Really I did
🙄
@kansas64 wrote:
they added a mapping feature also. Looks decent enough but it only goes from home cords to cache. I figure since i dont want to come home between each cache I will keep using my Nuvi and listening to “recalculating”
Just spend the extra time changing where your home is, each and every time.
@Team Deejay wrote:
Actually, I think you will find that most of the old timers would disagree here. Sometimes owners place caches where the biggest challenge is finding out how to access the location. After all, how many times have we bushwacked through thorns to a cache location, only to see a developed trail only 20 feet from the cache. All part of the game.
In a park or forest I agree that part of the fun. But when your talking about a cache that is placed in a neighborhood park/walking trail that only has a few access points, a parking area or trail head marking is, in my opinion appropriate, to prevent cachers (strangers) from wondering around aimlessly and crossing into people yards.
One of the caches I ignored is a perfect example of this. The cache tells you what road to go down but that is it. The road leads right into the neighborhood. Several times My wife and I tried to find a trail head with no luck. In desperation we even asked some of the homeowners where is the walking trail. Needless to say after asking 3-4 of them and getting that odd look we gave up. Some of the logs that others who found the cache even mention possibly walking across private property.
I’ve already put one or two local caches on ignore due to no trail head/parking coordinates. Finding a place to put the car and trespassing inadvertently should not be part of the caching experience.
**insert emoticon of the frog eating popcorn?
@Jeremy wrote:

41 votes (24%) – PCFrog (update of current logo)
17 votes (10%) – Existing WGA logo (keep current logo)By doing FUZZY math these two, which are amlost the same, got 58 votes. 😆
@Buy_The_Tie wrote:
Cons: 60CSx
auto-routing seem a little more “wonky” than the 76, but I have made no direct comparisonCould you conduct side by side test to see if they handle a trip in a different manner? It would be interesting to know.
GPSMAP 60CSx
GPSMAP 76CSxWhat I don’t get is the 76csx floats and has a larger screen, I know not by much, and comes standard with larger SD card. So why does it sell for less than the 60csx?
I tried for several months to teach mine to find them and it seemed I was making head way. However, we cut way back on caching because of gas and the training went out the window.
@Team Deejay wrote:
For those who like my Google maps, here is the link to that. I haven’t included the cache rescue caches in the map or the bookmark lists, but they will be available for logging.
Have fun
Ohhh Neat
Flambeau River State Forest
@Lostby7 wrote:
It comes down to the argument of …”those are not the cache owners trackables and therefore they have no claim over how they are traded.”
Some feel that as the goal of trackables is to move they should be moved as often as possible (what the owner usually wants), the cache owners wishes are irrelevant.
Dito
-
AuthorPosts