[redrusty]

is it ever gonna stop raining?

[redrusty]

hold my beer and watch this…………………….

[redrusty]

it’s hard to raise organic as a whole, because the yield is usually at least 20% lower. some of the implementations of “organic” fertilizers and feeds are also a matter of conjecture. from my past experience with organic farmers, i found that some of these so called organic farms were actually bending the organic rules. (using non-approved organic products for production)
it just seems to me that organic farming is sometimes hypocritical of what it promotes

[redrusty]

thanks everyone……i guess it is a milestone.

i want to thank marbleguy and wrongwayjunebug for meeting up with me on saturday for this.

#100 was one of sloughfoots’ caches, so a big thanks to you as well…

it’s really nice to go out and enjoy this sport with good people, and i really appreciate it.

once again, thanks to all of you that made this possible, whether
i had the opportunity to go caching with you, or had the opportunity to find one of your wonderful caches.

hope to see more of you folks out on the hunt. thanks again

[redrusty]

just can’t help myself…………………here i go again.

another good article i read:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/global_whining_vs_the_truth.html

maybe not enough facts, maybe not a consensus, maybe political, maybe pro/anti/neo/militant/commie/capitalist….i don’t know. it’s still a good read anyhow.

hyb

[redrusty]

good response. i got nothin……………….

[redrusty]

i’m sorry that you weren’t included in this ry, really i am. it was a really good question, and you’re right……

awright tyedyeskyguy, gloves are off again…..answer da question……..we need some examples of the 98%…………

in all reality though, ry deserves to have his question answered. if you could, find some examples for us. i’d like to know too.

[redrusty]

not to get political, but mccain is a sorry excuse for a republican……

how’s cachin goin for you? i’ve been wasting time as of late arguing against the theory of global warming………..

[redrusty]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolibertarian

[redrusty]

correction, correction…………..
i found the neolibertarian network:

http://incite1.blogspot.com/2005/03/neolibertarian-network.html

“The next question you might ask is, what is the Neolibertarian Network? The answer, at least as of right now, is: not much. It’s an association of thirteen likeminded blogs (so far) organized by QandO. The network serves as a central point for syndication feed aggregation, and they also plan to create a period publication.”

otherwise, the term “neolibertarian” is listed in the wiki—i hope you weren’t attempting to trust the almighty wiki……………..

[redrusty]

please take the opportunity to read this

http://eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/153_Regulation.pdf

“It’s a shame our own government/country, the biggest polluter, is not getting involved. This as the whole world laughs at us.”

as opposed to china and india?

neolibertarian network? please show me a site on the net that points to this, as i am having trouble finding it.

if you read the first paragraph of the site it states:

“Arguments based on science, news, and common sense. This site is non-partisan and non-religious based. In fact we fight the new faith based religion of global warming. Don’t keep arguing the subject, just tell them to go to GlobalWarmingHoax.com!”

as for the mccain ads-i only saw one on that website……..too many?
understand that i do not endorse mccain.

as for the middlebury column- i was pointing to the facts stated in the article.

“This as the whole world laughs at us.”

where did this come from?????? millions, and i mean millions of people trying to get into this country (legally and otherwise) are laughing?

listen, this is still the greatest country on the planet. there’s more opportunity here than anywhere else on the planet. anywhere. granted, it’s not a perfect setup, there’s room for improvement.

the whole world laughing at us thing should give pause for reflection…..the whole world takes us very seriously…….hence our worldwide subsidy of the rest of the planet. (nearly, that is)

[redrusty]

yep, icksnay on the atkay…………

while i don’t like cats…..i wouldn’t go out of my way to harm one………

[redrusty]

http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/comment.php?comment.news.77

http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/comment.php?comment.news.79

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming

http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.html

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2007/12/scientists_peti.html

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164004

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=5b824408-9df0-4189-86fc-cf6465bf0aa8

[redrusty]

http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php

[redrusty]

no, the earth is not flat……..i’ve seen pictures of it. i also have a globe. it’s not flat either……
so far this is a good debate…..i’ll not insult you at all tyedyeskyguy…..but “The current acceptance of climate change by climate scientists is 98%. Only 2% are still debating this. Is the earth still flat? 2% of our population believe that as well. ” thing is just a standard rebuttal by the gw crowd…..people that don’t believe in gw don’t think the world is flat…….the founder of the weather channel doesn’t believe in gw either
i’m guessing the 2% of the people you state that believe the world is flat are possibly remote tribes in undeveloped countries….

there are just too many inconsistencies in the gw theory. too many things are blamed on global warming.

question authority, but raise your hand first
–bill cosby

[Author]

Posts