Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 305 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Up for a good 5/5 ? #1883055

    That’s a 2 inch, beveled edge paint brush.

    You might want to add having 911 standing by.

    in reply to: Reviewer question-seed caches-yes or no? #1883164

    Interesting that you should mention “Be Like Rogheff“. Equally interesting is the comment about an explosion of new caches.

    Maybe others have had a different experience than I, but the 50 or so ammo cans that have been taken out of that cache have netted only about 10 new caches. Is that common for seed caches or do people just like to collect ammo cans?

    in reply to: Up for a good 5/5 ? #1883049

    All right, I’ll pipe in with a hint since it’s my cache. You should bring:

    3 toothpicks
    1 large thrermos of hot chocolate
    1 Bic lighter
    123.5 feet of high tensil rope
    1 flashlight
    1 buddy
    1 can of Alpo (to distract the bear)
    1 can opener
    1 trusty geostaff
    2 GPSrs
    1 climbing harness
    1 first aid kit
    1 machette
    1 tube of poison ivy cream
    1 roll of biodegradeable toilet paper
    1 Radio Flyer wagon
    3 MP3s
    1 hammer (claw)
    1 Sharpie marker
    1 open end wrench 9/16″
    2 snowshoes
    1 fishing boat 16′
    3 sets of corn on the cob holders
    1 metal detector
    1 BB gun
    1 can of OFF
    2 two way radios
    1 compass
    1 pencil
    1 framed backpack to load all your gear into

    You know, the basic gear needed to hunt any Rogheff cache 😆

    in reply to: Little Zip Locs #1883040

    I got a box of 250 at Hobby Lobby. They were cheaper than they are at Michaels

    in reply to: cache stuff #1882916

    Do you really want that particular tie “popping up” unexpectedly?

    😆 😆 😆 🙄

    in reply to: Whats in your bag? #1882779

    Eppi pen
    compass
    multi-tool
    flashlight
    extra rechargeable batteries
    toilet paper
    extra log sheets
    extra bags for extra log sheets
    pencil
    pen
    1942 Philco Problematic GPSr

    in reply to: What to buy … handheld vs. dash-mounted #1882450

    Something to consider…

    My wife works just over the Illinois border in Zion. It’s a sleepy little town. Two days ago, thieves went through her parking lot and smashed the windows of every car that had a dash mounted GPSr and stole them.

    It’s never pleasant when a Philco dies.

    in reply to: Public Hunting Land…. not a happy cacher #1881918

    @Team Deejay wrote:

    …. there is zero chance that anybody is going to get mistaken for a squirrel or a goose (or even a deer) and get shot.

    Unless the geocacher is wearing feathers during pheasant hunting season 😳

    in reply to: WGA2 Retires from reviewing caches #1881852

    I know I wouldn’t have had as much fun hiding caches without your work approving them. Thank you very much for volunteering your time. It IS appreciated!

    in reply to: What constitutes a wheelchair accessible cache? #1881812

    If a Rogheff cache is rated a 1 star terrain, you can get to and retrieve the cache while sitting in a wheelchair.

    in reply to: Custom Carved Hiking staffs #1880752

    Sure, a heavy shillelagh with a metal tip would do that. Honestly, I use my regular shillelagh with it’s rubber tip for everything, including digging through ice, water or logs.

    in reply to: Winter Caching #1881778

    Would an ammo can hidden in the stump of an old tree, frozen in a solid block of ice also be not available? Micros on the ground aren’t the only caches that have issues in the winter.

    in reply to: Custom Carved Hiking staffs #1880750

    glad to help

    in reply to: are you deleting temp caches? #1881536

    Here’s an interesting opinion on this very subject by Jeremy, owner of Geocaching.com:

    Jun5, 2007
    “There are, as Markwell has written, many shades of grey. And as I often write, as long as the activity doesn’t get too abusive I would posit that it doesn’t matter too much if someone does multiple logs on a cache. After all the find counts don’t get you a prize. Besides you can always pooh pooh those who don’t log caches the right way even if they are more prolific finders than you are. The same goes for hard caches over easy caches, urban caches or hiking caches, etc.

    Markwell also put it well that I generally don’t make judgements on the shades of grey. I only step in when the activity becomes carcenogenic (or epidemic).

    I’m of the opinion that anything below the “marks multiple finds for moving caches” is a no no. But my opinion has no bearing on the way the site should function in this area. Ultimately the cache owner decides. within reason, the parameters of the “find.”

    …and…

    June 4, 2007
    “1700 logs by 30 users is a bit of an overkill, however. It would be hard to argue that this kind of logging crosses the line for abuse.”

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 305 total)