Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,176 through 2,190 (of 4,841 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SIGN THE LOG #1967386
    sandlanders
    Participant

      @gotta run wrote:

      Allow me to preempt the usual cabal…

      Don’t tell me how to play the game!…It’s just a game…It’s not a competition…Sunshine and puppy dogs are the things that really matter…

      Actually, Sunshine DOES matter to Mr. Greenthumb! 😉

      in reply to: SIGN THE LOG #1967383
      sandlanders
      Participant

        We sign cache logs. If we can’t access the container or what’s inside, we won’t claim a find. But that’s us.

        Since no one is making big bucks by padding their finds stats, and since no one is preventing anyone from finding a cure for cancer by not signing logs, I don’t need to raise my blood pressure by worrying about this. Sometimes while doing maintenance, we don’t see some signatures, but we don’t know what the situations are behind that, so if those cachers can live with what they do or don’t do, so can I.

        If the cache has not been trashed or otherwise compromised, and the cachers who follow can find the cache in the way we intended it to be found, that is all we ask. Our caches don’t get hit as much as Mr. Greenthumb’s, and we can tell by reading any online logs (and we DO read those when we get our CO notifications) if there is anything hinky going on on a widespread scale, so it’s easier for us to go this route compared to others.

        I keep track enough of who’s been caching in the area when, and what else they have been finding around here. If they came to town and enjoyed a nice drive in the country, their scribbling a few marks on a piece of paper won’t make any difference to me.

        If things get bad, I should notice, and I might start doing things differently then, but for now… live and let live.

        in reply to: Which county? #1967346
        sandlanders
        Participant

          @sweetlife wrote:

          Here is my list of all known caches in Adams County, I have the list in GSAK, but printed it out in PDF format for you.

          Thanks, Barry! And PDF is always the right way to go for me.

          Now if GSAK could just get with the program and make GSAK for Mac… :LOL:

          in reply to: Which county? #1967343
          sandlanders
          Participant

            @huffinpuffin2 wrote:

            Macro mapcounties.gsk on GSAK calls it as Adams County, if that helps, or not 🙂 🙂

            Yes, that helps. I will call it an Adams County cache.

            GC2NV4V . . . This one definitely looks like Wood County (and I’ve always thought of it as Wood), but the given latitude is farther south than that of the other one! Must have to do with the curve of the earth or something…

            in reply to: Which county? #1967340
            sandlanders
            Participant

              @zuma wrote:

              @sandlanders wrote:

              I need to know how to find out which county a cache is in, specifically when it is visually straddling the border from all aerial views and maps. I don’t have GSAK. How does the GC site do it for “stats” purposes? Thanks.

              On the cache page of the cache in question, click on the Mapquest button. Mapquest shows the county lines.

              Still no help. It’s always sitting exactly on the line, same as in my Delorme and in the online topo maps. Just wondering… if that was my only cache for the two counties, which one would it count as? The stats programs have to decide somehow.

              But it’s not anything big. I can call it what I want. Just trying to identify all of the Adams County caches. GC2F6E5

              in reply to: Which county? #1967339
              sandlanders
              Participant

                @huffinpuffin2 wrote:

                Waushara

                Not one of the options.

                in reply to: Cheering, Jeering and Trash Talking #1964426
                sandlanders
                Participant

                  @Team Black-Cat wrote:

                  Yep. They just need to be willing to be grabbed and dropped by complete strangers.

                  What about just being “dipped” by someone we already know?

                  in reply to: Cheering, Jeering and Trash Talking #1964423
                  sandlanders
                  Participant

                    Can the “travelers” be humans, CJ? 😉

                    in reply to: Toasty Mitts? #1967183
                    sandlanders
                    Participant

                      @cheezehead wrote:

                      @sandlanders wrote:

                      @RSplash40 wrote:

                      Hey! I resemble that remark SL!

                      My comment was in reference to a phrase that HCH has used for himself when he makes typos, especially on coordinates. I was referring to the amount of material on one’s hands if wearing those gloves/mitts, and how it would interfere with accurate typing and coord entering, not the size of anyone’s hands.

                      See, that’s where your wrong, again.
                      A- I don’t use my choppers when I type.
                      B- I don’t have to enter coords into my GPS. I know how to download them.
                      C- My gps has buttons, so it all thumbs when navigating on my gps.
                      D- I use the choppers when – A deer hunting, B-Ice Fishing, C- Plowing Snow.
                      E- I usually use gloves and or fingerless gloves when geocaching or using my gps in the winter.

                      And that’s where you’re wrong… again. 🙄

                      I was not referring to you and your practices at all, Cheezehead. I used your name ONLY in reference to the comment you like to use. The rest of my statement addressed the dilemma others have been discussing here about needing bulk for warmth but fine hand coordination for using their receivers and for logging. I did not want Splash thinking I was commenting on the size of his or anyone else’s hands, so I explained what I meant by “fat fingers”, which one would be experiencing if wearing all those layers on their hands.

                      in reply to: Think its time to change the name of the game #1967252
                      sandlanders
                      Participant

                        @sweetlife wrote:

                        And I thought that my 40 points was good. Decided that I would try to give LCG a shot this year.

                        You don’t have to compete to play the game. Your 40 points just let everyone know that four caches are still in play and ready to be found. That’s how the game works. And congrats on joining the fun, Barry!

                        We’ve been playing since the LCG began five years ago and have never racked up the big numbers. But we’re having fun.

                        in reply to: Toasty Mitts? #1967178
                        sandlanders
                        Participant

                          @RSplash40 wrote:

                          Hey! I resemble that remark SL!

                          My comment was in reference to a phrase that HCH has used for himself when he makes typos, especially on coordinates. I was referring to the amount of material on one’s hands if wearing those gloves/mitts, and how it would interfere with accurate typing and coord entering, not the size of anyone’s hands.

                          in reply to: Think its time to change the name of the game #1967249
                          sandlanders
                          Participant

                            Those lonelies are available to anyone who wants to visit them. They don’t even have to be on the LCG list to look for them. Lots of neat places to visit in the state… on BOTH sides of Highway 64!

                            More visitors, fewer lonelies.

                            in reply to: Toasty Mitts? #1967175
                            sandlanders
                            Participant

                              Wow! Talk about “fat fingers”…. 😯 😯 😯 😉

                              in reply to: Dutch Oven Cook-Off #1967207
                              sandlanders
                              Participant

                                @BigJim60 wrote:

                                @CacheNoTrace wrote:

                                @sandlanders wrote:

                                Are you taking applications for judges? 😉

                                If you behave, I can add you to the judges list.

                                That’s a big if 😆

                                Too quote my late mother: “I’ll behave… but I won’t say how.”

                                in reply to: American Pickers visited at one of our cache sites #1962805
                                sandlanders
                                Participant

                                  Tonight. 8:00 p.m. History Channel.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 2,176 through 2,190 (of 4,841 total)