Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,481 through 3,495 (of 4,841 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • sandlanders
    Participant

      @Braid Beard’s Gang wrote:

      WGA…. The official tick census enumerators.

      This one gets my vote. 😆 😆 😆

      sandlanders
      Participant

        @-cheeto- wrote:

        WGA – Circling trees for the last 7 years.

        Now this one has me envisioning a dog with a need.

        in reply to: Wisconsin Geocache found in Arkansas? #1925195
        sandlanders
        Participant

          @Team Black-Cat wrote:

          Magellans and mushrooms. Bad combo.

          There is a thread about a Wisconsin cache being found on the other side of Lake Michigan, but I can’t seem to find it.

          How about this, TBC?

          http://wi-geocaching.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=7726&highlight=ludington

          in reply to: Trackables are not swag! #1925364
          sandlanders
          Participant

            HeliDood’s fairly new here. He hasn’t yet had the chance to share his opinions or to see all the rehashing of this issue. Both sides have points, both sides have validity. Is there a thread that we can refer HeliDood to?

            in reply to: serious? i hope so!!! #1925215
            sandlanders
            Participant

              Hey! Don’t go posting any “spoiler” photos here! 😉

              in reply to: Bigfoots in Wisconsin. I have proof! #1925145
              sandlanders
              Participant

                I’m thinking I can see the cache container that has been eluding you, too, Helidood. If you look reeeeeeeeally close, it’s on the left side, quite a ways down in the photo, and (spoiler alert) it’s on the railing somewhere!

                Gee, hope that Bigfoot didn’t wreck the fishing when he did his cannonball into the lake!

                in reply to: Bigfoots in Wisconsin. I have proof! #1925143
                sandlanders
                Participant

                  Did the “creature” also put the lid back on the container? If so, I would be more inclined to believe that Bigfoot was responsible.

                  And Helidood, since the above cache is in the area of the one you can’t find, I can tell you that Bigfoot definitely did NOT get Wazeecha Walking Trail! 😉

                  in reply to: 2010 WGA Geocoin Ideas Development and Discussion #1924870
                  sandlanders
                  Participant

                    Hey, Cheezehead! The “WGA” is north of Highway 64 on this one!

                    OK. Obviously, 2010 is needed somewhere on the coin, front or back.

                    With the coin in the shape of Wisconsin, will Door County be somehow attached without the sharp point (any chance of breakage)? Right now, it looks like DC could be used to extract logs from nanos.

                    GC colors or others?

                    Can we see what previous WGA coins looked like? I’ve only been around for the cow.

                    in reply to: 5-K-Spud! #1925168
                    sandlanders
                    Participant

                      Aahh… The cache that continues to amaze and draw seekers like the Holy Grail. But then K Spud continues to amaze also, as seen from his log for #5000. Nothing will stop this cacher from making a dent in the list of Wisconsin caches, although he still has a few left to find. Karl has his share of FTFs, too, and this winter we’ve been running into him at events all over the state (party animal… 😉 ).

                      So we have nothing left to say except…
                      Congrats on the 5K, K Spud!

                      in reply to: The white craphas disappeared! #1925071
                      sandlanders
                      Participant

                        Got a fresh supply of brown craphas from the neighbor dog this afternoon… 👿 👿 👿

                        in reply to: Wazeecha Walking Trail– The unfindable? #1925132
                        sandlanders
                        Participant

                          This cache IS findable. It just usually takes more than one try. If you read all the logs, you’re not alone in your frustration. Sometimes the container is “out of position” to be easy, or should I say “less hard”, to find. Another problem is the high visibility you experience in your search for the cache, both from the shore and the road. Hard to be stealthy and look for such a hard bugger. The CO checks on it a lot in response to DNFs. Sometimes it has traveled and sometimes it needs maintenance.

                          But I see you’ve found another area cache to drive you nuts, just a bit farther from your house this time. 😉 There’s always another white whale waiting in the wings!

                          in reply to: Wisconsin Geocache found in Arkansas? #1925186
                          sandlanders
                          Participant

                            Maybe if you eat the mushrooms, you just think you went to Arkansas to find the cache. 😉

                            in reply to: 7 to go #1925111
                            sandlanders
                            Participant

                              Must have been something in the spring air today to get those Rapids cachers out snagging those #100 finds. Congrats on finding yours at one of Cheeto’s favorite spots, Helidood! You’ve been heating up right along with the weather lately!

                              in reply to: blue_cougar54494 finds 100! #1925150
                              sandlanders
                              Participant

                                Trying to think which event excited blue_cougar54494 more… Canada winning Olympic gold in hockey or getting find #100. Well, we know which one took longer. 😉

                                But who could resist getting out caching today? We put this cache out for you, BC, as part of our co-birthday celebration in December, and you saved it for find #100. And it’s in a meaningful place for you, so every time you visit your family members there, you can also think of your geo-accomplishment.

                                But now it’s time to go celebrate with a blue frosted cupcake, eh? Way to go on The First Hundred, Becky!

                                in reply to: The white craphas disappeared! #1925060
                                sandlanders
                                Participant

                                  @cheezehead wrote:

                                  @RSplash40 wrote:

                                  Not sure where you are but I found enough craphas today…

                                  I agree. There’s enough around these part also.

                                  That’s because you are north of Highway 64, where the craphas chooses to linger. 😉

                                Viewing 15 posts - 3,481 through 3,495 (of 4,841 total)