Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 4,841 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pet Peeves #1908626
    sandlanders
    Participant

      @sandlanders wrote:

      People who steal threads! 😡

      (and who discuss FFL)

      in reply to: Car rental…any hot tips? #1909036
      sandlanders
      Participant

        Rented a car only once many moons ago, but the insurance thing and fill the tank are right on. We once looked into renting for the long haul trips like you want to do, but we figured the rental would cost way more than using our own car. Those are good to do if a bunch of you need a vehicle like a van or something that you don’t have in your own vehicles.

        If you rent for the long distance, check out the price for the large number of miles you will be doing and get the best deal there. I think at one time Alamo gave you like a couple hundred free miles per day of rental, but you’ll be packing on more than that.

        in reply to: Pet Peeves #1908623
        sandlanders
        Participant

          People who steal threads! 😡

          in reply to: Pet Peeves #1908621
          sandlanders
          Participant

            Didja check your email, Cheezy?

            in reply to: Pet Peeves #1908619
            sandlanders
            Participant

              mosquitoes 😡

              in reply to: DOC hits 2500 caches at Polk County event #1909021
              sandlanders
              Participant

                Way to go on #2500, DOC!

                in reply to: Ample Evidence of CSI’s Caching Investigations #1908976
                sandlanders
                Participant

                  Congratualtions on the 300 finds, the COTM, and most importantly — 😉 — your first post in the WGA forums!

                  in reply to: Marc’s WSQs #1908938
                  sandlanders
                  Participant

                    I have noticed on some of the caches pages that Marc had to — ahem — modify after the ALR edict came down that it’s harder on some to know exactly what we’re supposed to look for. There seemed to be detailed descriptions before, but now it might be just the cache title and the photo.

                    Still like the series but need a trip to pick up most of the finds.

                    sandlanders
                    Participant

                      I think that one takes the prize!

                      in reply to: Race to 10,000 #1901071
                      sandlanders
                      Participant

                        Maybe the problem will be slowing down enough to stop short before the intended date!

                        in reply to: Race to 10,000 #1901067
                        sandlanders
                        Participant

                          It’s June now. Still a few more finds needed by both teams to get near the 10,000 mark. Will they get there in time? The pressure is on!

                          in reply to: Pet Peeves #1908609
                          sandlanders
                          Participant

                            Or anyone pronouncing it “Wes-con-sin”

                            sandlanders
                            Participant

                              Ouch! I’ve lost two cameras to the water, but thankfully they were both on fishing expeditions and not while out caching.

                              in reply to: Pet Peeves #1908605
                              sandlanders
                              Participant

                                @labrat_wr wrote:

                                sometimes I just have a low people tolerance day

                                Time to get back out into the woods.

                                in reply to: New cacher in Janesville #1908929
                                sandlanders
                                Participant

                                  Can’t help you with the card and your receiver, but here are a couple of suggestions on placing the caches.

                                  1. When you plug in your zip code and get a list of caches in that area, look at the top of the page and find “search for caches with Google maps”. Click on that and you will see on a map where there are already caches. Zoom in to areas you are thinking of placing a cache. If nothing is shown there, you are usually OK with the placement as far as the distance goes.

                                  2. When you are working on a cache write-up, uncheck the box on the page that says “Yes, this is cache is currently active” before the initial submission. After it is submitted and you get a cache GC number, you can then look at the cache page, go down near the bottom, and search for nearby caches. That will relocate your search to the coordinates of the cache you are working on. If the nearby caches are all over 0.1 miles away, your cache should be OK for distance.

                                  On #2, you can go back and edit the cache page all you want. When you are ready to submit for review, recheck the “currently active” box and the reviewers will see the cache and decide if it meets the criteria for placement. Your distance should be OK, and hopefully everything else gets the “good to go”.

                                  Good luck, and keep coming back to the forums for help!

                                Viewing 15 posts - 4,246 through 4,260 (of 4,841 total)