Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,726 through 4,740 (of 4,841 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wisconsin Cache found in Michigan #1892755
    sandlanders
    Participant

      I think it’s now a travel bug with a goal of making it back to its original cache location.

      in reply to: Enough with the micro caches! Am I right, folks? #1892138
      sandlanders
      Participant

        Today…Four micros, a nano, a regular, a virtual, and a DNF. We’ll try them all, but like Hemi, we look at the cache pages before going out searching.

        The only thing we don’t like is a long and/or difficult hike to find a container that someone has “cleverly” hidden, swag or no swag. If the purpose is to get us to see a particular spot, we don’t need to spoil the pleasure of an area by spending lots of time looking for a micro with a “cute” clue or none at all.

        Micros are fun to find, even the ones in the pine trees. Just when we think we know where to look, we find a type of hide new to us. Don’t know what we’ll be like when find a few hundred more or if we go out on big cache runs (which we don’t think we’d like anyway), but right now, we’re still in the learning process and enjoying the game how we play it.

        in reply to: Crossing the 1000 mark #1892735
        sandlanders
        Participant

          Yay! 😀 😀 😀

          You all “done good”!

          in reply to: Millennium Club #1892726
          sandlanders
          Participant

            OK, who’s who and when was the photo taken?

            in reply to: Peach107 Hides His Hundreth #1892671
            sandlanders
            Participant

              Haven’t done a peach107 cache yet, but we’ve looked at some cache pages that have intrigued us. Guess we have to plan a caching trip to peach area!

              Thanks for all your hides, peach107!

              sandlanders
              Participant

                Congratulations to nunsontherun and Sloughfoot! Two things off their caching “bucket list”!

                in reply to: Cachelovskys travel to Texas for #900 #1892610
                sandlanders
                Participant

                  Hey, great news on #900, Cachelovskys! Texas is a big state–will you get #1000 before you come back? 😉

                  in reply to: Uploading a graphic for a cache page #1892527
                  sandlanders
                  Participant

                    Well, I finally got my graphic on to my cache page. I guess I was “saving as” JPG all right, but there was no extension that said JPG, so I just wrote it on and the thing worked!

                    Uploading went fine, then I had to fiddle around a bit with the html to get it the size I wanted and centered. Then everything after the graphic got centered, so I looked at what I had copied for the WGA notice on the page and applied that to my graphic. No more centering of everything.

                    I’m learning a lot of new stuff doing cache pages–never had done anything with html before, so I seem to be finding what I want, then “reverse engineering” it to my needs.

                    It’s great to know that there are so many knowledgeable people in this group who are willing to provide “HTML for Dummies” and other support for those of us who are less skilled. Thanks, everyone! 😀 😀 😀

                    in reply to: Uploading a graphic for a cache page #1892525
                    sandlanders
                    Participant

                      Have tried both but it still doesn’t work. I can “save as” OK, but the graphic doesn’t show up with the JPEG suffix. That’s probably why it won’t work when I try to upload to the cache page.

                      I’ll try again when I can get on to geocaching.com.

                      in reply to: GC has changed #1892556
                      sandlanders
                      Participant

                        It won’t accept my log in right now.

                        What a surprise to see the new look. Hope it’s not like some other sites I visit that have changed their offerings to include more bells and whistles, and now with our dial-up, it takes so long to find what I want that some of those are hardly worth using. (One is an online newspaper–may as well by the thing in it’s 20th century format.)

                        in reply to: Redrusty is over 100 finds #1892430
                        sandlanders
                        Participant

                          Congratulations, redrusty!

                          in reply to: Elfdoctors get earthy and Rock to #1000 #1892452
                          sandlanders
                          Participant

                            Congratulations on the Big 1-0-0-0!

                            in reply to: Frizz hits a Memorial 1000th cache in Red Wing #1892442
                            sandlanders
                            Participant

                              Way to go on #1000! Looked like it was a toughy, too.

                              in reply to: KS9WI Hits 1000!!!! #1892456
                              sandlanders
                              Participant

                                WOW! 1000! Congrats!

                                in reply to: New WGA Logo Referendum, Round 2 #1891154
                                sandlanders
                                Participant

                                  Anyone can find similarities in any design to some other design. The block letters look like Washington’s logo (but I think the Wisconsin one is more compact and has more impact) and the stylized “g” looks like so many other logos that happen to use the small letter “g”, including a new one that Google is using. (Can a stylized “w” and “a” be included to highlight the whole organization, not just the “g”?)

                                  There was even a law suit about 10 years ago between Garth Brooks and Warren G over the same g logo, and then the former Spice Girl Geri Halliwell tried to use a small g, too.

                                  “It’s always something”, so I say: The membership has given advice, the board will discuss the results and give reasons for which logo they choose (that’s why we elected them–to make decisions and take the flak), any necessary tweaking will be done (this isn’t a $$$$ advertising account), and we can all start using the new WGA logo on our cache pages, etc.

                                  Let’s move on.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 4,726 through 4,740 (of 4,841 total)