Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,467 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Injured Reserve #1738974
    Ray

      These are the Wisconsin caches that are currently disabled. I have made no attempt to contact the owners other than creating a list for all to peruse. If you find one in your neighborhood that you might be able to fix, go ahead and contact the owner. Right now, I don’t plan on anything more than providing a consolidated list. ~tb

      in reply to: Chippewa Valley Event #1739254
      Ray

        GREAT NEWS

        this will be something to look forward to. ~tb

        in reply to: looking for help #1758897
        Ray

          Jackie,
          I would be happy to lend a hand.
          ~tb

          in reply to: Where have all the old names gone ……. #1761528
          Ray

            Gosh,
            I just stopped for a coffee exchange,
            I didn’t think I was gone that long.
            ~tb

            in reply to: Archiving caches #1761486
            Ray

              Update..
              It’s been a couple of weeks since I suggested the archiving of 18 caches. I thought I would do a follow-up check. Today only three of those 18 remain on my watch list. The others have either been repaired or archived. There are now 172 disabled caches in the state. This is still too many, but some progress is being made. keep up the good work my fellow cachers. ~ tb

              in reply to: CBS News report on geocaching #1761322
              Ray

                quote:


                Originally posted by kbraband:
                … For those of you who have broadband connections, you can watch the video …(Sorry, Beast!)


                I will have to take a peek while I am at work

                in reply to: Platial.com #1761316
                Ray

                  The site looks interesting, but not very friendly to dial-up connections. ~tb

                  in reply to: Does wind effect your GPS readings? #1761319
                  Ray

                    Another likely cause is that the winds are changing the cloud cover and thus changing satellite signal strength at your GPS receiver. We sometimes see this effect with commercial radio and TV signals. The wind itself does not affect radio signals, but the stuff the wind moves can. ~tb

                    in reply to: The” Flag” Series #1741836
                    Ray
                      in reply to: Interested? #1750595
                      Ray

                        This might be doable for us.. I am not sure what your energy level is, you wouldn’t want us holding you back. Where have you cached and where do you want to cache? T&tb don’t do islands or mountains (well we did one mountain in West Virginia, but not any more).

                        in reply to: Archiving caches #1761474
                        Ray

                          Jeff’s original question: What’s being done?

                          Actually, we have made an occasional attempt to get volunteer’s to go out and recover a cache here and there. The effort is a bit obscure since it has been done largely on the BOD pages and by e-mail. The Lion’s share of our problem caches heave been traditional (Single caches) that have gone missing, ergo: no geotrash. We still have a problem with micro multi’s with forgotten waypoints. I don’t know that there is an easy solution to this. When we know where these micro waypoints are, we do make the effort. We all need to do our part when we see caches going derelict. It is part of the CITO effort as well. ~tb

                          in reply to: WGA map #1744678
                          Ray

                            Actually, the link was changed many months ago when Brillig and Groundspeak had their falling out. The link will currently take you to the groundspeak map and it is current. if you click on the “identify” button it will tell you what’s what. It doesn’t give the GCxxxx but will give a link to the cache page under the map.
                            http://www.geocaching.com/map/WI.asp

                            it sure does look like the brillig map.

                            in reply to: It is about the numbers ! #1761340
                            Ray

                              Within 100 miles 4352
                              filtered 3609

                              Within 10 miles 168
                              filtered 54

                              The closest one left for us is 2.7 miles

                              These numbers have changed by a factor of 10 over the past 4 years.
                              We have a lot of work to do!

                              in reply to: A different kind of paperless #1761290
                              Ray

                                Trudy & I have been doing a lot of Columbus caching for the past several months. To give ourselves a fair chance, we only download Traditional caches. As long as we clear the GPS before we load the new list, we will do alright. during our last couple of Columbus caching adventures, we averaged over 90%…

                                Clues? We don’t need no stinkin’ clues! ~tb

                                [This message has been edited by Trudy & the beast (edited 03-25-2006).]

                                in reply to: Its pretty sad #1761190
                                Ray

                                  Sometimes I think my hands have a mind of their own. They certainly have mor difficulty wit spelling than my brain dos. May-B that’s what our Schitzpreenic friends are experiencing. ~tb

                                Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,467 total)