Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 280 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A challenge for JThorson? #1748645

    I know what it says!!!! After using my Little Orphan Annie Secret Decoder Ring, Heres the solution:

    Drink More Ovaltine.

    A stupid crummy commercial? Aww Nuts!!!

    HO HO HO!

    in reply to: Voting geographic/demographic #1758395

    Yup, thanks.. I figured starting a new topic since it was slightly different. The numbers shown don’t answer the number of members, just how many votes were received. With 5 votes per team, I don’t know the algebraic solution to reverse engineer the numbers. but you are probably right or very close.

    [This message has been edited by WISearchers (edited 02-14-2005).]

    in reply to: “What’s Next?” for “What’s Next?” #1756811

    quote:


    Originally posted by Uncle_Fun:
    …1,000 by the campout???

    Uncle_Fun


    Tim has it all charted out to be at 1000 by a certain time. If it takes them that long, I’d be surprised!

    Mr. WISearcher

    in reply to: Personal Hygiene Issue #1740276

    quote:


    Originally posted by Miata:
    Come on beast! Does a bear really crap in the woods???


    There’s a joke in there about a bear & a rabbit. Hope you know it! LOL

    in reply to: About US emails #1744199

    quote:


    Originally posted by fishcachers:
    “Mozilla”….. sounds like a bad horror movie.

    ~MF


    Mozilla. Mozilla?!!!!

    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!OH NOOOOO!!!

    in reply to: Do you bring your compass with you?!? #1748145

    You beat me to it! I was just coming here to paste the link! LOL

    in reply to: About US emails #1744191

    quote:


    Originally posted by Ms. WISearcher:

    you joined some weird site or something…lol


    No honey, those emails to to a different email address you don’t see… I just subscribed to nakedWGAmemberswithlowmortgages.com LOL

    in reply to: Kayaks #1750977

    thanks Ken and Russ for your very informative words! I will keep them in mind in making a buying decision!

    in reply to: Did you ever wonder… #1749120

    In a related subtopic: How about how fellow geocachers pronounce your geo handle if it could be ambiguous?

    Did wzbt03 ever dream he’d be called Wizbit?
    brkster: I thought when I saw it, it was and have other people say “berkster”
    Arcangl come to find out is not Arch Angel!
    WISearchers are also know as the Why searchers, or Wisconsin Searchers
    Is it Bray band? or Bra band?
    I’m just gussing it not dj weenie… but winnie..

    hmmm. Things to ponder. Now I will be up all night!

    Happy Thanksgiving all!

    in reply to: Geocaching in the News 11/7/2004 Parade Magazine #1737576
    in reply to: Team Badger elects Commander-In-Chief #1750388

    After almost a 2 month hiatus, we must take our methodone. See you there!

    in reply to: Amazing New Technology #1748023

    more than meets the eye!

    in reply to: Did you know? #1748083

    Was the act of pressing the wax seal called “caching”?

    in reply to: where to hunt a cache in deer season #1748005

    Lost:

    Considering the topic I’m not sure I’d agree with your tagline! LOL

    WISearchers

    in reply to: Ethics and Geocaching – Second Part #1747960

    It’s definitely NOT a numbers game to us, although sometimes our sprees in Rockford, Chicago or Milwaukee may imply that. Ms. WISearcher and I have not been (geo) caching (almost slipped, Ken! in almost 2 months. For us IT IS about enjoying the sunset, killing mosquitoes, getting wet, singing the praises of a well hidden cache, hearing & seeing absolutely nothing manmade, and spending time with friends, your significant other and family.

    We’re not the ones in question, but for about 4 caches one time, we did split up and pair off so that each team was represented was present at the cache signed, if that makes sense. I don’t see any difference in that to caching without all members of the team. If one has a problem with that, I won’t apologize. That said we don’t purposely cache that way. I am proud of ALL of the caches we’ve done and logged; we’ve earned ALL of them with blisters, sweat, and blood. Apparently some cannot say the same.

    I’m aware of the cachers in questions. I’m neither surprised nor do I care much. While I don’t approve of logging a cache for other teams who were not there or represented at all, we all seem to be calling this cheating or unethical.

    Devil’s Advocate: Is it really cheating or unethical if the numbers don’t really matter? (to you?) Is it really cheating if it’s not a competition or a game? It’s not either. It’s a unique activity with blogging. People who log a cache as discussed with a coordinated effort, will quickly lose interest (I hope).

    So take the stats down, take the milestones forum down, and we’re back to where we should be, an individual challenge. People react to positive reinforcement, and by continuing to applaud these teams, WE (WGA Members) are partially to blame. If it’s still important after deemphasizing numbers on the forum, they will still continue to climb.

    These few teams who ARE about the numbers, will continue to artificially inflate numbers and sign generic logs (that don’t verify they were actually there,) will overtake the top of the board eventually and be king or queen of the WGA, & IGOTMESTUFF web page. Hooray!(<


    Extreme sarcasm)

    Remember this WGA royalty: A king is not a king without loyal subjects.

    Tony

    typo edit

    [This message has been edited by WISearchers (edited 11-11-2004).]

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 280 total)