Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 409 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pike Lake caches #1963643

    Thanks also.

    Who is in charge of making sure the weather is great for this w/e of fun?

    in reply to: crappy logs bugging me #1962759

    I think I like this one the best so far. 🙂

    I also remember that banner. I would spend quite a bit of time watching it to see if I knew the picture. LOL.

    in reply to: Missing Trackable Rant #1964007

    @Averith wrote:

    We’ve had very similar experiences. We will still send out travel bugs, but we keep our geocoins for discovery at events.

    Ditto on this. I have become soured with my trackables going MIA. Like many people that have been given some very nice coins, I will never release them into the world of muggles. Many of them have thousands of miles and adventures on them and I enjoy shring them with cachers at events.

    I do have 4 coins that are on ‘holiday’ with a caching friend in Europe right now. They are having the time of their little lifes. 😆

    I also abide by the suggestion that TB’s are not a 1-for-1 trade, but not to have the cache cleared out of them either.

    in reply to: Geocache on Dartmoor in the UK #1963998

    I saw this cache request before by someone, but forgot whee it is located. I seem to remember that it is up towards LaCrosse. Maybe we could form another team from Madison and take this on.

    in reply to: Clever hide or big problem??? #1963957

    Somewhere, in a Walmart parking lot, there is a naked lamp post!

    in reply to: Clever hide or big problem??? #1963945

    First, these would violate our guidelines for a WSQ cache. These would have to be placed ON a gravesite in order to blend in. When you purchase a plot, in every sense of the word, you have a “deed” to that piece of land.

    The closest I have placed a cache is my first one which is between plots in some trees. Every other one is on the outskirts of the property, where most should be.

    in reply to: Old article on the oldest WI geocache #1963901

    @kbraband wrote:

    @WStemple wrote:

    GC253 – Pookie’s Stash is one of the 2 caches that predate Pike Powder Hike. It did not event last a year. 🙁
    GC266 – Geocache is another one of the three

    Have not found the other one, as it looks as if Ken did not find/log it.

    The other one was hidden south of Sheboygan and listed on geocaching.com but it was never found by anyone and was archived not long afterwards.

    So even some of the early ones had issues also. I did not check, but I wonder if there are caches at those sites today?

    Feb. 2, 2008

    There are 514113 active caches worldwide.
    In the last 7 days, there have been 283867 new logs written by 42168 account holders.

    I had fogotten how much the site has changed.

    Went way back to the first good page archived and checked out an old cache in IL. GZ is now a retention pond for a shopping center!

    I also took a look at the one in MN. The area is still rugged, so it might still be there. Back then they did not use GC numbers!!

    in reply to: Old article on the oldest WI geocache #1963896

    GC253 – Pookie’s Stash is one of the 2 caches that predate Pike Powder Hike. It did not event last a year. 🙁
    GC266 – Geocache is another one of the three

    Have not found the other one, as it looks as if Ken did not find/log it.

    in reply to: Rash of cache thefts #1962917

    @Northwoods Tom wrote:

    @sandlanders wrote:

    I have found that condensation is a problem in PVC pipe caches. Never found actual water, but lots of damp stuff inside.

    I knew someday someone would find a use for those little moisture packs/pills that come in so many products 🙂

    I will have to get mine together and post them on ebay/craigs list. 🙂

    in reply to: Snake identification? #1963867

    Just found these pictures of some young ones. The head is a different color on them.

    in reply to: Snake identification? #1963866

    @Team Black-Cat wrote:

    Certainly looks like this guy…
    http://www.dekaysbrownsnake.com/

    Yes it does, except for the difference in the head. Markings are also not as defined. I wonder if this is a young one.

    in reply to: Rash of cache thefts #1962907

    Time to get the heavy cables out and strap these puppies down! I have access to some nice 1/4 inch stranded cable. 😆

    in reply to: Snake identification? #1963863

    Even though it does not look like the picture on the DNR PDF, it does sound like a Brown Snake. Here is a description that I found.

    A very small tan snake with two parallel rows of tiny dark spots down the back; found most commonly in southern three-quarters of Wisconsin, in dense ground vegetation and debris.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 409 total)